2log(x-1) + logx = logx + log4

  • Thread starter Thread starter nae99
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving the logarithmic equation 2log(x-1) + logx = logx + log4. Participants emphasize the importance of canceling identical log terms on both sides, leading to the simplified equation log(x-1)^2 = log4. The solution involves applying logarithmic identities, resulting in the quadratic equation (x-1)^2 = 4, which yields the final solutions x = 3 and x = -1, with a reminder that x must be greater than 1 for the logarithm to be defined.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic identities, specifically log(a) + log(b) = log(ab) and log(a) - log(b) = log(a/b).
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation, including solving quadratic equations.
  • Knowledge of the properties of logarithms, particularly the definition of logarithmic functions.
  • Basic skills in handling equations involving square roots.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study logarithmic identities in depth, focusing on their applications in solving equations.
  • Practice solving quadratic equations using the quadratic formula and factoring methods.
  • Explore the implications of logarithmic functions in real-world applications, such as in finance and science.
  • Review the concept of domain restrictions in logarithmic functions to understand valid input values.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra, particularly those tackling logarithmic equations, as well as educators looking for examples of logarithmic problem-solving techniques.

  • #31


Pranav-Arora said:
What are you doing?
6/2=3 and 2-2=0.
Your both the answers are wrong. Correct them.

OMG, such simple mistakes huh, ok

x= 6/2 = 3

x= -(-2) - 2/ 2 = 0/2 x= 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


That's too much unnecessary work. From,

(x-1)^2=4

Take the square root of both sides (remember the \pm).
 
  • #33


Mentallic said:
That's too much unnecessary work. From,

(x-1)^2=4

Take the square root of both sides (remember the \pm).

You're right Mentallic but nae99 is doing such silly mistakes here in this thread.

@nae99- take care, since you need to consider this case:- x-1>0
 
  • #34


thanks much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K