Is this the correct way to solve a logarithmic equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lionely
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a logarithmic equation, specifically the equation 2log2 x - log2 (x-3) = 2. Participants are exploring the correct application of logarithmic properties and the manipulation of the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to expand and manipulate logarithmic expressions, questioning the validity of their steps. Some express confusion over the properties of logarithms, particularly regarding the subtraction of logarithms and the interpretation of logarithmic expressions.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct approach to the problem, with participants providing feedback on each other's attempts. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of logarithmic expressions and the implications of their manipulations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are reflecting on errors made in previous attempts, particularly in relation to test performance. There is a focus on ensuring that the expressions are correctly interpreted and manipulated according to logarithmic rules.

lionely
Messages
574
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


2log2 x - log2 (x-3) = 2





The attempt at a solution

So what I did was , expand the brackets

2log x - logx + log3 = 2

logx = 2-log3

logx = log 4 - log 3

log x = log ( 4-3)

x= 4/3?

Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lionely said:

Homework Statement


2log2 x - log2 (x-3) = 2





The attempt at a solution

So what I did was , expand the brackets

2log x - logx + log3 = 2

logx = 2-log3

logx = log 4 - log 3

log x = log ( 4-3)

x= 4/3?

Is this right?

No, it's wrong. log(a-b) is not equal to log(a)-log(b). Try taking 2 to the power of each side of your original equation.
 
Aww got that wrong on my test then ;((

Okay how about this?

log x^2 / (x-3) = log 4

removing logs

x^2/(x-3) = 16
16x-48 = x^2

x^2 -16x + 48=0
(x -4 )(x -12)
 
Last edited:
lionely said:
Aww got that wrong on my test then ;((

Okay how about this?

log x^2 / (x-3) = log 4

removing logs

x^2/(x-3) = 16
16x-48 = x^2

x^2 -16x + 48=0
(x -4 )(x -12)

=/ messing up operations if the worst feeling in the world =/

What you get after 'removing logs' would be fine if your original equation were 2log(x)-log(x-3)=4 since 4=log(16). Was it?
 
lionely said:
Aww got that wrong on my test then ;((

Okay how about this?

log x^2 / (x-3) = log 4

removing logs

x^2/(x-3) = 16
16x-48 = x^2

x^2 -16x + 48=0
(x -4 )(x -12)

=/ messing up operations if the worst feeling in the world =/

This is wrong, too, right in your first step. I should add that what you wrote is probably not what you meant. This is how the left side would be interpreted:
$$ \frac{log x^2}{x - 3}$$

From your subsequent work, I think this is what you meant:
$$ log(\frac{x^2}{x - 3})$$

If so, when you write it in plain text (as opposed to LaTeX) add parentheses, like this
log(x2/(x - 3))

Where you headed in your first step uses the idea that if log A = log B, then A = B.
Applying that idea, you get x2/(x - 3) on the left side. What do you get on the right side? Hint: NOT 16.
 
log(x^2/(x-3)) = log 4

(x^2/(x-3)) = 4?
 
lionely said:
log(x^2/(x-3)) = log 4

(x^2/(x-3)) = 4?

Yes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K