Solving Logarithmic Equation: Why Isn't It Working?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tweety1234
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 4K views
tweety1234
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I can't seem to get my head round this problem, I know how to use the 'change the base rule'

[tex]log_2 x + log_4x = 2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{logx}{log2} + \frac{logx}{log4} = 2[/tex]

why is this not correct ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mgb_phys said:
It looks correct - what's the problem
(of course everytime I stray into maths I make an dumb mistake!)

well the answer book gives the solution like this,

[tex]log_2x + \frac{log_2 x}{log_2 4} = 2[/tex] don't understand why its base 2 here?

[tex]log_2 x + \frac{log_2 x}{2} =2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{3}{2}log_2 x = 2[/tex] don't understand were 3/2 came from ?

[tex]log_2 x = \frac{4}{3}[/tex]

[tex]x = 2^{\frac{4}{3} }[/tex]
 
They are just collapsing it all into the same base log.

[tex]log_2 x + \frac{log_2 x}{2} =2[/tex] is just

[tex]1.5 * log_2 x =2[/tex] which is

[tex]\frac{3}{2} * log_2 x =2[/tex]

It's the same answer as you get - but you can do it this way without needing to calculate log() of anything
 
tweety1234 said:
[tex]log_2 x + log_4x = 2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{logx}{log2} + \frac{logx}{log4} = 2[/tex]

so is this method still correct? can I just add both logs up ?
 
mgb_phys said:
They are just collapsing it all into the same base log.


[tex]log_2 x + \frac{log_2 x}{2} =2[/tex] is just

[tex]1.5 * log_2 x =2[/tex] which is

[tex]\frac{3}{2} * log_2 x =2[/tex]

It's the same answer as you get - but you can do it this way without needing to calculate log() of anything

sorry, I still don't get where 1.5 comes from ? I thought you just multiply both sides by two to get rid of the fraction ?

[tex]2log_2 x + log_2 x = 4[/tex]
 
mgb_phys said:
They are just collapsing it all into the same base log.

[tex]log_2 x + \frac{log_2 x}{2} =2[/tex] is just

[tex]1.5 * log_2 x =2[/tex] which is

[tex]\frac{3}{2} * log_2 x =2[/tex]

It's the same answer as you get - but you can do it this way without needing to calculate log() of anything

mgb_phys said:
[tex]log_2 x + \frac{log_2 x}{2} = 2[/tex]

Which if you ignore the logs for now is just; a + a/2 = 2

a(1+1/2) = 2

1.5a = 2

3/2 a =2

oh I get it now, thanks a lot for your help!