2nd Order ODE,Homogeneous,Non-Constant Coeff.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tim85ruhruniv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd order
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) of the form \((c_{o}+xk)y''+ky'=0\) with boundary conditions \(y(0)=y_{0}\) and \(y(l)=y_{l}\). The solution involves the natural logarithm function, specifically \(y=\ln(c_{o}+xk)\), which effectively reduces the order of the equation. Constants \(c\) and \(k\) are related by the equation \(\frac{c_{l}-c_{o}}{l}=k\). The user successfully derived the general solution after some initial challenges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with boundary value problems
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study methods for solving second-order ODEs with variable coefficients
  • Learn about boundary value problems and their applications
  • Explore the use of logarithmic functions in differential equations
  • Investigate numerical methods for approximating solutions to ODEs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineering students, and anyone involved in solving differential equations, particularly those dealing with boundary value problems in applied mathematics.

tim85ruhruniv
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to guess the solution for this i am sure the solution involves a ln(x) so that i can reduce the order to find the general solution but i just can't seem to find it... any suggestions ??

[tex]\[<br /> (c_{o}+xk)y''+ky'=0\][/tex]

with ths usual boundary conditions
[tex]\[y\left(0\right)=y_{0}\qquad y\left(l\right)=y_{l}\][/tex]

c and k are constants and they are related
here is the relation if it is of any additional help...
[tex]\[<br /> \frac{c_{l}-c_{o}}{l}=k\][/tex]

thanks a lot :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phew after some hits and misses got it finally :)

[tex]\[<br /> y=ln\left(c_{o}+xk\right)\][/tex]

seems to solve the equation...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K