3 by 3 matrix with an orthogonality constraint

Click For Summary
A real 3x3 matrix has 9 entries, representing 9 independent parameters. However, when applying the orthogonality constraint (RR^T = I), it leads to 6 independent equations due to the symmetry of the resulting matrix. This means that not all equations are independent; specifically, 3 equations relate to the diagonal entries being 1, and 3 relate to the off-diagonal entries being 0. Consequently, only 3 parameters can be chosen independently, with the remaining entries determined by these equations. Thus, the discussion clarifies how the orthogonality constraint reduces the number of independent parameters in a 3x3 matrix.
touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
This is a paragraph from a book, which I don't understand:
"How many independent parameters are there in a 3x3 matrix? A real 3x3 matrix has 9 entries but if we have the orthogonality constraint,
RR^T = 1
which corresponds to 6 independent equations because the product
RR^T being the same as R^TR, is a symmetrical matrix with 6 independent entries.
As a result, there are 3 (9-6) independent numbers in R."
I can understand why a real 3x3 matrix has 9 entries. But the sentences after that...I don't understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
touqra said:
This is a paragraph from a book, which I don't understand:
"How many independent parameters are there in a 3x3 matrix? A real 3x3 matrix has 9 entries but if we have the orthogonality constraint,
RR^T = 1
which corresponds to 6 independent equations because the product
RR^T being the same as R^TR, is a symmetrical matrix with 6 independent entries.
As a result, there are 3 (9-6) independent numbers in R."
I can understand why a real 3x3 matrix has 9 entries. But the sentences after that...I don't understand.
The orginal statement is a bit peculiar. "How many independent parameters are there in a 3x3 matrix?" is answered by the first part of the next sentence. Since a real 3x3 matrix has 9 entries- 9 independent parameters. However, it then talks about the "orthogonality constraint" as if it were talking about orthogonal matrices all along.
Imagine writing out a 3x3 matrix and its transpose, then multiplying them. Since RRT= 1, that gives 9 equations. However, RTR must give the same thing so that not all of those equations are independent. There are 3 equations that say the quantities on the main diagonal are equal to 1 and 3 equations that say the quantities above the main diagonal are equal to 0. The 3 equations that say the quantities below the main diagonal are 0 do not give us anything new because of the symmetry. There are (no more than) 6 independent equations. You could choose 3 of the entries independently (as the parameters) and then solve the 6 equations for the remaining 6 numbers.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K