3. concentration of sodium sulphate in the resultant solution?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the concentration of sodium sulfate after neutralizing sulfuric acid with sodium hydroxide. The initial conditions include a 2.00M sodium hydroxide solution and 20.0mL of 1.00M sulfuric acid. The user claims the concentration of sodium sulfate is 0.500 mol/L but does not provide the calculations to support this conclusion. Other participants indicate that without the working, it's difficult to verify the accuracy of the answer. The conversation highlights the importance of showing calculations in chemistry problem-solving.
DavidQT
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
3. In an experiment, 2.00M sodium hydroxide solution was added to 20.0mL of 1.00M sulphuric acid until the acid was just completely neutralized. What is the concentration of sodium sulphate in the resultant solution?

My final answer is 0.500mol/l. Am i correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DavidQT said:
3. In an experiment, 2.00M sodium hydroxide solution was added to 20.0mL of 1.00M sulphuric acid until the acid was just completely neutralized. What is the concentration of sodium sulphate in the resultant solution?

My final answer is 0.500mol/l. Am i correct.
Probably not correct, but you haven't included your working so it's not possible to see where we disagree.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Chemistry How to take into account autoprotolysis in weak base solution?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Concentration of a salt produced by neutralization reaction
Replies
5
Views
3K
Lowest concentration of ethanoate ions
Replies
2
Views
2K
How Much Precipitate Forms in a Copper Sulfate and Sodium Hydroxide Reaction?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Solving a pH Change After Adding Sulfuric Acid to Sodium Hydroxide
Replies
12
Views
4K
Titration Exam Question 1: Calculating Concentration of Undiluted Nitric Acid
Replies
3
Views
3K
Chemistry How to calculate pH at equivalence point using this alternative?
Replies
7
Views
1K
Creating a buffer out of 0.100M solutions
Replies
1
Views
2K
Chemistry Understanding how to calculate pH of a buffer solution
Replies
2
Views
1K
Solving Concentration Problems: Sodium Cations
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top