I have 3 equations with two unknowns of the form:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]r_i == f_i (g,\beta)[/tex]

Where g and [itex]\beta[/itex] are the independent unknown variables and [itex]r_i[/itex] are known experimentally, but have some error associated with them, say something like [itex]4.3 \pm 0.3[/itex] and there are other errors associated with constants inside the [itex]f_i[/itex].

My question is how do I solve for the objectively "best" fit to those two parameters. I remember doing something like this back in prob/stats, I believe I do something like a [itex]\chi^2[/itex] fit but I can't find anything online about it that doesn't concern bins of data points, but rather continuous functions. (Or do I have to simulate data, then fit it)

Can anyone lead me in the right direction? I don't have any of my undergrad books with me.

The equations are all something like :

[tex]

r_1 =\frac{\left(g^2 x+g^2y-\frac{\beta }{3}\right)^2}{g^2 }

[/tex]

with some variations on the form. So nothing with unsolvable functions.

EDIT: Oh and I plan on using Mathematica to do this, but I'd rather understand the mathematics first.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# 3 Equations with 2 Unknowns

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**