3 point electrical charge problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the electric field at the origin due to three point charges: a +2.5 µC charge at (-0.20 m, 0.15 m), a -4.8 µC charge at (0.50 m, -0.35 m), and a -6.3 µC charge at (-0.42 m, 0.32 m). The electric field magnitudes calculated were E1 = 3.6e5 N/C, E2 = 1.2e5 N/C, and E3 = 2.0e5 N/C. The participant initially miscalculated the resultant electric field components due to incorrect angle considerations, leading to discrepancies with textbook answers. Correcting for quadrant signs and using the law of cosines resolved the angle issues, but confusion remained regarding the angle adjustments for point 3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electric fields
  • Familiarity with vector addition in physics
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their application in physics
  • Ability to interpret and apply the law of cosines
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the application of Coulomb's Law in electric field calculations
  • Study vector addition techniques in two dimensions
  • Learn about the law of cosines and its use in physics problems
  • Explore the significance of angle quadrants in trigonometric calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and point charges.

ievans_wsu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given 3 point charges as follows:
1) a +2.5uC charge at (-0.20m , 0.15m)
2) a -4.8uC charge at (0.50m , -0.35m)
3) a -6.3uC charge at (-0.42m , 0.32m)

What is the electric field at the origin (0,0)?

Homework Equations



E = (k * q) / (r^2) (To find the magnitude)

k = 9.0e9 (N m^2)/C^2

Etotal = Ex + Ey

Vx = (Magnitude * Cos(θ) )
Vy = (Magnitude * Sin(θ) )

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I plotted each point on a plane, and found the distance each point was from the origin using basic trig.

Point 1 had a distance of .25m
Point 2 had a distance of .61m
Point 3 had a distance of .53m

From there, I found the magnitude using the first stated equation.

E1 = 3.6e5 N/C
E2 = 1.2e5 N/C
E3 = 2.0e5 N/C

My textbook ends here saying that the addition of the vector magnitudes along the X axis should yield Ex. If i do that, I get E1 + E2 - E3 which equates out to be roughly 2.8e5. The answer in the back of the book states 2.1e5 is the correct answer. So, I did some online digging and found that the law of cosines is needed, but is not stated anywhere in the textbook sample problem. The angles I found were as followed

1) 37°
2) 35°
3) 38°

Using these angles in the equation of (Magnitude)(cos(Angle) I found the following new values

E1 = 2.88e5
E2 = 9.5e4
E3 = 1.59e5

Adding these in the manner stated before (E1 + E2 - E3) I get 2.24e5, which satisfies the X component of the problem. Now, when it comes to the Y component, I found that if you take the Sine of the angles above, and multiply them by the magnitude, it should result in the overall Y vector. The book states that -4.1e3 should be the answer, but I get nowhere near that answer. I get -1.58e5. It's been a while since I've taken physics so I'm a bit rusty. Are there any steps or equations that I'm not seeing? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to be more careful with the angles. In particular make sure you're getting the angle in the correct quadrant. I'm getting

1) 180 - 36.9 = 143.1°
2) -35.0°
3) 180 - 37.3 = 142.7°
 
Okay, I completely forgot about the sign changes between quadrants. My question though is why is point 3 180 - 37.3? Cosine is positive in Quadrant IV, I'm just not sure why 180 is being used to get the angle. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K