3 Questions on Inverse, Reciprocal, and Trigonometric Integration

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomcenjerrym
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the difference between inverse and reciprocal functions, stating that the reciprocal is the multiplicative inverse, while the inverse function relates to composition. It confirms that sin^−1(u/a) and arcsin(u/a) are equivalent notations for the same function. To remember the integral of du/(√(a^2 − u^2)), participants suggest using the identity sin²(x) + cos²(x) = 1 and a substitution of sin(θ) = u/a, which simplifies the integral. The transformation leads to the conclusion that the integral evaluates to sin^−1(u/a) + C. Understanding these concepts is essential for mastering trigonometric integration techniques.
tomcenjerrym
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Hi again everyone…

I have 3 questions:

1) What is the difference between INVERSE and RECIPROCAL?

2) Does sin^−1 (u/a) equal to arc sin (u/a)?

3) What is the EASIEST way to remember that integral du / (√(a^2 − u^2)) = sin^−1 (u/a) + C or any transformation of trigonometric integration?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1) RECIPROCAL is the INVERSE to multiplication.
2) Yes
3) Just remember it... there are far more terrifying identities -- better get used to it ;)
 
tomcenjerrym said:
Hi again everyone…

I have 3 questions:

1) What is the difference between INVERSE and RECIPROCAL?
It has already been pointed out that the reciprocal gives the multiplicative inverse. More generally, if f(x) is a function, its reciprocal is 1/f(x). Its inverse (if it has one) is the function f-1(x) such that f-1(f(x))= f(f-1(x))= x. The reciprocal is the inverse under the operation of multiplication, the "inverse function" is the inverse under the operation of composition of functions.

2) Does sin^−1 (u/a) equal to arc sin (u/a)?
Yes, they are different notations for the same thing (arcsin(x) is just a bit old fashioned).

3) What is the EASIEST way to remember that integral du / (√(a^2 − u^2)) = sin^−1 (u/a) + C or any transformation of trigonometric integration?

Thanks
Remember that sin2(x)+ cos2(x)= 1 so that cos2(x)= 1- sin2(x). \sqrt{a^2- u^2}= a \sqrt{1- (u/a)^2} so the substitution sin(\theta)= u/a gives cos(\theta)d\theta= (1/a)du and the integral becomes
\int \frac{du}{sqrt{a^2- u^2}}= \frac{1}{a}\int\frac{du}{\sqrt{1-(u/a)^2}}
= \int \frac{cos(\theta)d\theta}{\sqrt{1- sin^2(\theta)}}= \int d\theta= \theta+ C
Of course, since sin(\theta)= u/a, \theta= sin^{-1}(u/a).
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top