- #1

- 9

- 2

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- I
- Thread starter runningc
- Start date

- #1

- 9

- 2

- #2

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 27,199

- 5,907

The most straightforward way would be to use Cartesian Co-ordinates and resolve each of the three vectors along arbitrary x, y and z axes and add the x components together and likewise for the y and z components. Then the overall resultant vector is given by adding the three resulting components.

- #3

- 951

- 420

... Then the overall resultant vector is given by adding the three resulting components.

Where, of course, “adding the three resulting components” is vector addition. The resultant magnitude is found by adding the magnitudes in quadrature and the angular direction requires resolving to some angular representation, probably Euler angles, by appropriate trigonometry.

Frankly I’d just leave it as components. It’s easier, just as meaningful and twice as useful. (for those of us who favor linear algebra)

- #4

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 27,199

- 5,907

Agreed - unless you actually need to draw a line on a graph.Frankly I’d just leave it as components.

- #5

berkeman

Mentor

- 62,240

- 13,007

And the Wikipedia article is a pretty good introduction:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_vector

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_vector

Share: