What Is 4-Dimensional Curl? Get Your Answer Here!

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter purplegreen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of "4-dimensional curl," exploring its mathematical formulation and implications in higher dimensions, particularly in the context of vector fields and differential forms. Participants examine the generalization of the curl operation beyond three dimensions, touching on theoretical aspects, mathematical structures, and applications in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that there is no specific entity known as "4-dimensional curl," but rather refer to concepts in exterior algebra or Grassmann algebra for generalizations of vector products.
  • One participant explains that generalizing curl to 4 dimensions results in a 6-dimensional value, contrasting it with the 3-dimensional case where curl can be represented by an anti-symmetric 3x3 matrix.
  • Another participant describes how in 4 dimensions, the notion of rotation about an axis becomes complex due to the existence of an entire plane of vectors perpendicular to any given plane, leading to the need for an anti-symmetric 4x4 matrix.
  • Some participants mention that in the context of physics, the 4D curl of a 4-vector can be expressed as a second rank antisymmetric tensor, with specific covariant components defined by the difference of derivatives.
  • There is a discussion about the application of the curl operator in differential forms, suggesting that it can be generalized to any degree forms in any dimension.
  • One participant expresses interest in understanding the relationship between the notation used for the antisymmetric tensor and the curl operation in the context of relativity theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definition or implications of "4-dimensional curl." Multiple competing views are presented regarding its mathematical formulation and physical interpretation, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of curl in higher dimensions, the complexity of mathematical structures involved, and the varying levels of familiarity with advanced mathematical concepts among participants.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in advanced mathematics, differential geometry, vector calculus in higher dimensions, and applications in theoretical physics, particularly in relativity theory.

purplegreen
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I would just like to know what the 4 dimensional curl is?

I believe it is a matrix but I am not completely sure.

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is nothing specifically called a "4 dimensional curl" but you might be interested in a google search on "exterior algebra" or "Grassmann algebra". This notation provides the proper mathematical generalization of various types of vector products in any number of dimensions. Beware that the situation becomes more complicated and there are many more types of products as you increase the number of dimensions of the space you're working in.

From these algebraic structures you can also construct various types of derivatives in n-space. You can also construct differential forms which allow various types of integration that generalize the ideas of line and surface integrals from ordinary 3 dimensional vector calculus.

The first chapter of "Differential Forms and Connections" by R.W.R. Darling covers this topic. The text is quite mathematical though and may not be suitable if you don't have some background in basic linear algebra and real analysis and feel comfortable with higher levels of mathematical abstraction. I enjoyed the text but found myself scratching my head quite a bit and it took a lot of work to get through it and feel satisfied.

Perhaps others have recommendations.
 
Last edited:
Also want to point out any generalization of curl to 4 dimensions leads to a 6 dimensional value. But I'll first explain 3 dimensional curl.

Three dimensional curl can be geometrically interpreted as a rate of rotation induced by a vector field. It can be described using a 3 by 3 matrix representing the "induced rotation" in the plane generated by each pair of axis (x, y and z). However, this matrix must be anti-symmetric. A pair of like axis doesn't generate a plane and thus the diagonal elements (x-x, y-y, and z-z) aren't used. Also any rotation in the the x-y plane is just the negative of the same rotation in the y-x plane (same goes for y-z vs z-y and z-x vs x-z). Therefore there are really only three planes needed to completely describe a rotation in 3-space, namely x-y, y-z, and z-x.

It turns out in three dimensions each plane has exactly one normal vector, so each plane rotation can be described as a rotation about a given axis using the right hand rule. However this doesn't hold in 4 dimensions because there is no longer a single normal vector for each plane. Instead there is an entire plane of vectors perpendicular to any given plane. Therefore the common notion of "rotation about an axis" no longer makes any sense. Vector fields in dimensions other than 3 do not have a vector form of curl.

Instead the rotation must be described from an anti-symmetric 4 by 4 matrix, which turns out to have 6 linearly independent elements. In the notation of differential forms the curl of a 4 dimensional vector field is not a vector but a bi-vector. The 6 differential rotation components are 2 dimensional objects (dx^dy, dy^dz, dz^dw, dw^dx, dx^dz, and dy^dw).

So in general, the n-dimensional "curl" will be bi-vector with n(n-1)/2 linearly independent components. It just so happens that when n is 3 we get 3*(3-1)/2 = 3 so there is an isomorphism between the bi-vector form and the vector form. Vector fields in \mathbb{R}^n with n something other than 3 do not have a vector form curl, but all have a bi-vector form curl.
 
Last edited:
In the context of physics (relativity theory), the 4D curl of a 4vector A is a second rank antisymmetric tensor F whose double covariant components (6 of them being independent) in a coordinate basis are

F_{\mu\nu} = \nabla_{\mu}A_{\nu} - \nabla_{\nu}A_{\mu}

Standard stuff.
 
in differential form notation, I believe "curl" is a differentiation operator on (co)vector fields, i.e. it is d applied to a one form,

specifically it is d(pdx + qdy + rdz) = dp^dx + dq^dy + dr^dz

= (∂p/∂x dx + ∂q/∂y dy + ∂r/∂z dz)^dx +...obvious stuff, and since dx^dx = 0, we get

= ∂q/∂y dy^dx + ∂r/∂z dz^dx + similar stuff...this operator can be applied to any degree forms in any dimension in the exact same way. you could call any of them higher dimensional curls. you only have to know dx^dx = dy^dy = dz^dz = dw^dw = 0...

and dx^dy = -dy^dx,...
 
dextercioby said:
In the context of physics (relativity theory), the 4D curl of a 4vector A is a second rank antisymmetric tensor F whose double covariant components (6 of them being independent) in a coordinate basis are

F_{\mu\nu} = \nabla_{\mu}A_{\nu} - \nabla_{\nu}A_{\mu}

Standard stuff.

I'm not familiar with that notation. Is it the same as the anti-symmetric tensor...

\dfrac{\partial A_i}{\partial x_j} - \dfrac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i}

This is stuff I'm interested in learning at some point but haven't had the time.
 
For General Relativity (no torsion and coordinate basis), yes

\nabla_{\mu}A_{\nu}-\nabla_{\nu}A_{\mu} = \partial_{\mu}A_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}

, so it doesn't matter is the curvature is present or not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K