50 Ohm to 75 Ohm to 50 Ohm line?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Helmholtzerton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Ohm
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of impedance mismatches in a signal transmission setup involving different coaxial cable impedances (50 ohm and 75 ohm) and how these mismatches influence the readings on an oscilloscope. Participants explore mathematical descriptions, analogies to optics, and practical implications of the configuration, focusing on theoretical and experimental aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a setup with a signal generator, multiple coaxial cables of differing impedances, and an oscilloscope, questioning how the 75 ohm cable affects the oscilloscope reading.
  • Another participant draws an analogy between the impedance mismatch in the described setup and the Fabry-Perot case in optics, suggesting that reflections and transmissions will vary based on cable lengths.
  • It is noted that reflections will occur at the impedance transitions, and the length of the 75 ohm cable may complicate the analysis due to its resonant properties.
  • A participant mentions the importance of considering the effective characteristic impedance when combining cables of different lengths and impedances.
  • One suggestion involves adding a shunt capacitor across the 75 ohm connector to compensate for the mismatch, particularly for narrow bandwidth applications.
  • Another participant emphasizes the relevance of cable lengths and suggests using a simulator to visualize the effects of the configuration.
  • There are mentions of the standing wave ratio and the implications of reflected waves on the source signal, with some participants indicating that the effects may be negligible in practical terms.
  • Concerns are raised about the frequency of the signal and its relationship to the cable lengths, suggesting that higher frequencies could complicate the situation further.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the implications of impedance mismatches, with no consensus reached on the best approach to analyze or mitigate the effects. Some participants agree on the importance of considering reflections and cable lengths, while others propose different methods or analogies without resolving the overall uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their analysis, including assumptions about cable lengths relative to wavelength and the need for further research on specific configurations. There is also mention of the potential for practical experimentation to observe effects directly.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those involved in electronics, signal processing, or telecommunications, particularly in contexts where impedance matching and transmission line theory are relevant.

Helmholtzerton
Messages
30
Reaction score
4
I'm trying to understand how I can mathematically describe a particular situation in order to calculate what I should expect to read on an oscilloscope.

Let's say I have a signal generator that is generating a 1MHz sinusoidal signal 1Vpp. The source impedance of the signal generator is 50ohm. This goes into a 50ohm BNC coax cable. This cable is connected to a 75ohm BNC coax cable. That cable is connected to a 50ohm BNC coax cable with the other end connected to an oscilloscope terminated at 50 ohms.

Now, without any losses, if I just went...
Signal generator -> 50ohm coax -> oscilloscope @ 50ohms, I should expect to see 1Vpp on the oscilloscope.

But by adding a 75ohm coaxial cable to the middle of that circuit, how would that effect the reading on the oscilloscope? Can I treat each mismatching point as both a source and a load along the transmission line?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What happens in the r-f case with the impedance mismatch in the configuration you described is precisely analogous to the Fabry-Perot case in Optics of light incident on a dielectric slab. In this case., ## \frac{1}{Z} ## replaces the index ## n ## in the expressions for the Fresnel reflection and transmission coefficients ## \rho ## and ## \tau ##. There will be cable lengths where constructive interference occurs on transmission, and cable lengths where the signal is reduced because of the way the multiple reflections add to each other. Hecht and Zajac's Optics textbook treat the optics problem in detail. ## \\ ## In a google of the topic, I was unsuccessful at getting a "link" that showed the very well known results that are presented in Hecht and Zajac. See: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0201838877/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helmholtzerton
One additional item: With this kind of configuration, even if you terminate the line with a 50 ohm resistor, there will still necessarily be a wave that reflects off the 75 ohm "slab" that returns to the source. I would need to research this further to see how to send a 1 volt sinusoidal signal from the source and get a good reading on it that isn't affected by the reflected wave.
 
Because both ends of the circuit are matched to the 50 ohm cables, there will be a reflection at the 50 to 75 ohm step, there will be another reflection at the 75 to 50 ohm step. But the length of the 75 ohm cable resonator between the steps will confuse the situation. The only thing more you need to know to work out the response will be the transit time in the 75 ohm cable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helmholtzerton and Charles Link
Helmholtzerton said:
I'm trying to understand how I can mathematically describe a particular situation in order to calculate what I should expect to read on an oscilloscope.
The wavelength is 300m. An engineering solution is that, as the oscilloscope cables are short compared with the wavelength, they act as a single cable having an intermediate value of characteristic impedance. This is reasonably correct up to an eight of a wavelength. If the 50 and 75 Ohm sections are equal length, then Zo = SQRT (75 x 50). Now the question becomes that you have a 50 Ohm load on a 61 Ohm cable which is, say, 1 electrical degree in length. The generator will now see the 50 Ohm CRO in series with a miniscule inductance. It is possible to calculate this if wanted.
Incidentally, you do not clarify whether the signal generator provides 1 volt P-P pd or emf, that is terminated or open circuit. This could trap you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helmholtzerton, Charles Link and Baluncore
When a short length of 'incorrect' cable is used (i.e. short in terms of wavelength), there is a simple approximate solution. Find the published / typical Capacitance per metre of the 75Ω cable and compare it with the capacitance of a 50Ω cable. Add a shunt capacitor across the 75Ω connector. For a narrow bandwidth and a low carrier frequency, a lumped component can often give a good compensation.
The actual lengths of cable involved are very relevant here. If you already have the equipment with you, you could 'dab' a small capacitor of the calculated amount and actually eyeball the effect on a scope. I suggest that you may see no difference at all in a non-critical experiment. Alternatively, buy some cable of the right impedance ( ? ).
I don't usually think in terms of Simulators but this could help the OP to give some idea of the possible effect.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helmholtzerton
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helmholtzerton
Best not to suggest digging out the Smith Chart - except to show how little difference rotating it by just a few degrees would make.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helmholtzerton, tech99 and CWatters
Charles Link said:
One additional item: With this kind of configuration, even if you terminate the line with a 50 ohm resistor, there will still necessarily be a wave that reflects off the 75 ohm "slab" that returns to the source. I would need to research this further to see how to send a 1 volt sinusoidal signal from the source and get a good reading on it that isn't affected by the reflected wave.
The wave is reflected with a standing wave ratio of 1.5 but very small time delay. So it is not significant in practical terms. If the cables had been significantly long in terms of wavelength, we could calculate the input impedance of each one when terminated by the last. We could also obtain the worst case condition by adding the reflection coefficients from each joint. Ref Coeff = (VSWR-1) /(VSWR+1). This will occur at certain frequencies.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helmholtzerton and Charles Link
  • #10
tech99 said:
The wave is reflected with a standing wave ratio of 1.5 but very small time delay. So it is not significant in practical terms. If the cables had been significantly long in terms of wavelength, we could calculate the input impedance of each one when terminated by the last. We could also obtain the worst case condition by adding the reflection coefficients from each joint. Ref Coeff = (VSWR-1) /(VSWR+1). This will occur at certain frequencies.
I didn't look closely at the frequency here to determine its effect on the cable length. The OP really has a problem with some interesting physics when the frequency is sufficiently high that the stretch of 75 ohm cable is more than 1/8 of a wavelength. ## \\ ## I first saw the calculations for this case in Optics, where a monochromatic wave is incident on a thin film, etc. About 15 years later, I saw the same calculations in a problem on transmission lines where we had impedance mismatches. It could be useful for the OP to study this in detail. The best source I know of for this problem is the Optics text by Hecht and Zajac.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helmholtzerton
  • #11
Where is the OP in this discussion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helmholtzerton

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
3K