How Does the Mathematics in Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity Differ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nlsherrill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the mathematical foundations necessary for understanding General Relativity (GR) and Quantum Mechanics (QM), highlighting the distinct and overlapping topics in each field. For GR, essential mathematical concepts include tensors, Riemannian geometry, differential geometry, manifolds, and linear algebra. Recommended resources for learning these concepts include Schutz and Carroll's texts. In contrast, QM requires proficiency in solving differential equations, linear algebra, and group theory, particularly SU(2) for spin. The discussion also emphasizes the importance of complex analysis and abstract algebra for Quantum Field Theory (QFT), noting that while much of the necessary math is learned concurrently with the courses, prior knowledge can be beneficial. The participant is seeking advice on which math electives to take to prepare for senior-level QM and introductory graduate GR, with a focus on courses that would enhance their understanding before taking these physics classes. Graduate-level courses are identified as those numbered 500 and above.
nlsherrill
Messages
320
Reaction score
1
I usually don't do threads like this, but I wanted to get some opinions for either people in the field, or people who have at least taken graduate level classes in GR or QM.

What are the main math topics in each of these fields? Is there much overlap at all or are the two topics pretty separate? I have taken modern physics, and am currently in spacetime physics(intro GR course), but so far all I have seen is a little bit of calculus and differential equations in both courses. Where does it really separate?

I am a math major as well as physics, and I have a ton of free math electives to choose from. Which courses out of this list would be most applicable to senior level QM or an introductory graduate course in GR?

http://www2.acs.ncsu.edu/reg_records/crs_cat/MA.html

I have to take QM 1 and 2, and want to take GR my last semester in undergrad. I have about a year before then, so if there's anyway I could take some math courses that could prepare me or even put me ahead of the math in these topics, then that would be great.

thx
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what courses in that list are specifically for undergraduates or graduate students, but I can give you a good idea about the math you'll need for these topics in general.

For GR you can learn all the math you need without cracking open a math book. Schutz and Carroll give a good introduction to the mathematics needed. I'm more familiar with Carroll to be honest. In general GR requires a knowledge of topics like tensors, Riemannian geometry, differential geometry, and manifolds. You'll obviously also need to know linear algebra.

For QM, you need to be comfortable solving differential equations and linear algebra. Group theory is also useful when you learn about the importance of SU(2) for spin. QFT has a lot of math you need to learn, especially functional integrals when they come up in the path integral approach.

Once more I should add a caveat that the math you need for the course you usually learn while taking the course. Also QFT isn't mathematically rigorous. There's a reason people still study the mathematical foundations and questions about Yang Mills theories are worth 1 million dollars! My advice is to download the draft of Srednicki's book. The introduction has a list of equations you should know before taking QFT
http://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~mark/qft.html

Differential equations, linear algebra, and abstract algebra are very important for QM and QFT and I'm sure there's some things I'm forgetting...oh complex analysis is also needed for QFT. It's helpful to know about residues and contour integrals. Lie groups and algebras will also come up all the time, but that's not typically taught at the undergraduate level, although once again you probably won't need the whole formal framework.
 
LBloom,

Once the course numbers get to 500, they are considered graduate level. That's fine for me to take those. I am in real analysis right now and have taken intro grad level applied PDE's
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top