How do I derive the projectile parabola equation using equations of motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nameVoid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the projectile parabola equation using the six equations of motion for constant acceleration. Participants mention four key equations, including v2 = v1 + at and x2 = x1 + v1t + 1/2 at^2, while expressing uncertainty about the remaining two equations. It is suggested that the projectile's vertical motion can be modeled with acceleration due to gravity (a = -g) and horizontal motion with no acceleration (a = 0). The derivation of the parabolic path can be achieved using these principles. Understanding these equations is crucial for accurately modeling projectile motion.
nameVoid
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
write out the six equations of motion in 1 dimension for constant acceleration and from those derive the equation y(x) for the parabolic path of a projectile.


I have
v2=v1+at
x2=x1+1/2 (v1+v2)t
x2=x1+v1t+1/2 at^2
v2^2=v1^2+2a(x2-x1)

not sure of the remaining 2 and the derivation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
42
:rolleyes:
 
hi nameVoid! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box :wink:)
nameVoid said:
I have
v2=v1+at
x2=x1+1/2 (v1+v2)t
x2=x1+v1t+1/2 at^2
v2^2=v1^2+2a(x2-x1)

not sure of the remaining 2 and the derivation

hmm … i have no idea what the other 2 https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=204" equations are supposed to be :confused:

but anyway you should be able to get the projectile parabola by using those four …

with a = -g in the y direction, and a = 0 in the x direction :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top