Coriolis force - Question about sign

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the expression for Coriolis acceleration, Ac = -2ω x v, where ω is the Earth's rotation vector and v is the velocity of an object. The question raised is about the origin of the minus sign in the equation, with a suggestion that it relates to the choice of reference frame, specifically non-inertial frames. It is clarified that the minus sign arises from the convention of using right-handed coordinate systems, rather than being a fundamental aspect of the physics involved. The Coriolis force is acknowledged as a consequence of Newton's laws, and the mathematics may vary with the reference frame, but the underlying physics remains consistent. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the arbitrary nature of coordinate system choices in physics.
Curious2013
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Dear all

I have a question concerning the Coriolis acceleration expression. I learned it as Ac = -2ω x v, where ω is the vector which indicates the rotation axis direction of Earth and v the velocity of a body that I want to check the Coriolis effect on.

My question: where the minus sign comes from? As far as I understand, it depends on what reference frame I use (inertial or non inertial - the minus comes from the latter, like the Earth, in my conception). Am I correct?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Curious2013 said:
Dear all

I have a question concerning the Coriolis acceleration expression. I learned it as Ac = -2ω x v, where ω is the vector which indicates the rotation axis direction of Earth and v the velocity of a body that I want to check the Coriolis effect on.

My question: where the minus sign comes from?
You can swap ω and v, and the minus sign is gone:

-2ω x v = 2v x ω

Curious2013 said:
As far as I understand, it depends on what reference frame I use (inertial or non inertial
The Coriolis force exist only in non inertial frames.
 
The minus sign is there because humans made the arbitrary decision to use right-handed coordinate systems rather than left handed ones.

The Coriolis force is just a consequece of Newton's laws of motion. The physics doesn't depend on what frame you use to describe it, or whether the frame is inertial or non-inertial. The details of the math depend on those things, but "the map is not the country", and similarly "the math is not the phyiscs".
 
AlephZero said:
The minus sign is there because humans made the arbitrary decision to use right-handed coordinate systems rather than left handed ones.

no, it would still be there, because you'd still need v = ω x r :wink:

(btw, this is a duplicate thread to https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=659387)
 
AlephZero said:
The minus sign is there because humans made the arbitrary decision to use right-handed coordinate systems rather than left handed ones.
To me it seems more like it's the arbitrary decision to have ω first in the term.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
705
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
10K
Back
Top