What is the Franck-Condon principle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics love
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
physics love
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
hi guys

I want to know what is the Franck-Condon principle?... please in details

thanks for all
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From the BO approximation, we have the product of the electronic \varphi_i(r,R) and the nuclear \eta_i(R) wavefunction. For the transition, we use Fermi's Golden rule, where the Dipole-Operator \mu "initiates" the transition. So we end up in
r_{i\rightarrow j}=\left\langle \eta_i(R) \varphi_i(r,R) |\mu| \varphi_j(r,R) \eta_j(R) \right\rangle.
Here we have an inner integral over the electron coordinates r and an outer integral over the nuclei coordinates R. It is important to note here that the inner integral \left\langle \varphi_i(r,R) |\mu| \varphi_j(r,R) \right\rangle is a function of R. The approximation is now that this inner integral is taken out of the outer interal, even though the former one is dependent of R - which is the integration variable of the outer integral. Now the above equation looks like this:
r_{i\rightarrow j}= \left\langle\varphi_i(r,R) |\mu| \varphi_j(r,R) \right\rangle \cdot\left\langle \eta_i(R)|\eta_j(R) \right\rangle
So actually the electronic integral is handled independently of the nuclei integral. The former one is a usual transition (with an operator for the transition according to Fermi's Golden rule), while the latter one is only an overlap of wavefunctions any more!
 
Schafspelz, the approximation you made can be justified further by using diabatic electronic states ##\eta_j## instead of the adiabatic electronic wavefunctions. The diabatic states depend only very little on R.
A second step in the Franck-Condon approximation is to replace the dipole integral by a semiclassical expression so that only the neighbourhoods of the turning points of the nuclear motion contribute to the integrand.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top