Longitudinal Wave Equation meaning and derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of the wave formula y=Asin(w(t-x/v)) to both transverse and longitudinal waves. In the context of longitudinal waves, y can represent either pressure at a point or the displacement of particles in the medium, which moves parallel to the wave's direction. The conversation also addresses the harmonic motion of a point at rest when a wave passes, noting that the point's speed is greatest at its midpoint of motion. Additionally, it highlights the conservation of energy in wave motion, where the sum of potential and kinetic energy remains constant. The equation effectively describes this harmonic motion for both types of waves.
Enterprise D
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have recently been studying waves, and I understand the transversal wave formula

y=Asin(w(t-x/v))

which gives the y coordinate of a point at x along the x-axis in the instant t.

However, Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longitudinal_wave) gives this as the equation for longitudinal waves too.

If this is true, what does y represent? The displacement of a point relative to what? Also, does anyone know how to derive this formula specifically for longitudinal waves?

Thanks very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For something such as a sound wave, Y represents the pressure at point x, at time t. It's a bit more challenging to visualize, but the formula is applied the same way.
 
For a longitudinal wave, y can also represent the displacement of particles in the medium. The displacement is to and fro parallel to the direction of propagation of the waves, whereas for a transverse wave the displacement is at right angles to the direction of propagation. The equation you quote can be used to represent either sort of wave.
 
Hi, thanks for your replies!

So am I right in saying that when the wave reaches a point at rest, the point starts to move with a harmonic motion in which its point of rest becomes the middle point of the motion (i.e. where its speed is greatest)?

How can we show that the equation describes this kind of motion?

Thanks!
 
For any wave that is neither damped nor forced and at constant amplitude, the energy of deflection (spring or pressure energy) plus the energy of motion (kinetic energy) is a constant. Hence when the energy of deflection is zero the kinetic energy is at a max, and vice-versa. As you state.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Back
Top