Why negative Rockwell Hardness value is considered as "no good"?

AI Thread Summary
Negative Rockwell hardness values are not used due to potential confusion and the limitations of the measurement system. The Rockwell hardness test relies on specific scales, with values like 130 for the C scale indicating infinite hardness, where no indentation occurs. If the indentation exceeds certain depths, it results in erroneous negative values, which are not meaningful in practice. The choice of 130 as a reference point is based on experimental data and serves to keep hardness values within a convenient range. Overall, negative values are avoided in convention because they indicate improper testing conditions or unsuitable material hardness for the chosen scale.
null void
Messages
102
Reaction score
1
I have read some pdf files and it says negative Rockwell hardness value is not used because of it would cause confusion.

What I currently know is :

HR(C/B) = N - h/s;

for C scale, N = 130; while for B scale N = 100;
s always = 0.002

and h is the permanent depth of the indentation.

I think these 2 addition question might related to the reason for not using negative value:

i) negative value means the indentation is like the indentation exceed 0.26mm for C scale,
0 > (130 - h/0.002); h bust be at lease 0.26mm, does this 0.26mm means anything significant?

ii) And i also read that 130 in C scale is the indicate infinite hardness, any simple way to explain why it is 130?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't know about (i), but for (ii), a value of 130 means h=0, no indentation at all.
 
Thanks for your reply. Is that 130 is determined through experimenting the indentation on materials? Probably they can't get a that kind of condition to happen i guess they extrapolate the graph to 0 indentation.

Do you know the N value for other scale?

I also find that I never see negative value on the Rockwell scale, is this the reason they don't use negative value in convention?
 
Last edited:
null void said:
Thanks for your reply. Is that 130 is determined through experimenting the indentation on materials? Probably they can't get a that kind of condition to happen i guess they extrapolate the graph to 0 indentation.
It is an arbitrary value to put the hardness values in a convenient range.

I also find that I never see negative value on the Rockwell scale, is this the reason they don't use negative value in convention?
Very soft materials could have that, but I guess then you should use a different scale.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Generally, the indenter has limited travel. At .26 travel the C scale value would be zero. Similarly, a B scale indenter would bottom out at .20 travel. The indenter itself is also different. For B scale measurements, a ball bearing is normally used. For C scale measurements a conical diamond is usually the indenter. The indenter configuration varies according to the material and test type. For surface specific hardness, like case hardening, you don't want the indenter to penetrate deeper than the zone of interest, which may only be in the thousandths. If the indenter bottoms out, or you get something silly like negative hardness, you are doing the wrong test.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Yeah right, the measurement become error when they penetrated too deep, thanks guys for clearing my confusion up
 
Back
Top