Shalashaska
- 32
- 0
DaveC426913 said:The guy is doing it voluntarily; it's simply a matter of asking his permission to monitor him.
Because the proof is on the pudding.
I guess it depends on what you consider "busted". Him breathing some moisture on his breath is a far cry from him going six days without water with no deleterious effects.
Hey - maybe his manna only replenishes him once every 24 hoursSeriously though, your short-term samplings fail to capture the gross effect.
Ok, let me put it another way... he's 82 years old, and either desperate for attention/money or mad as a march hare. Test his A1c, image him until he glows in the dark, and unless someone can offer an explanation as to how human anatomy can violate thermodynamics, conservation of energy, and more, I don't see the need for this test.
I understand that you also think this guy is a few sandwiches short of a picnic (which he would clearly disdain), but at 82, when his body begins to metabolize his own muscle tissue, that could box in his kidneys VERY rapidly when you add dehydration to the mix. Can we really say that a man who claims to have existed by dint of magic is capable of informed consent?
I don't object to an old man sticking himself in a box until he dies, although I dislike the idea. I HATE the notion of medical doctors ignoring the axiom to do no harm. It may not be in the Hippocratic Oath, but it's a good notion regardless. If he were in a prison, he would be fed and hydrated against his will, and for a damned good reason.