A: Calculate Ferlini's acceleration = 12.3 m/s / 0.16 s = 76.875 m/s^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter cherryrocket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerate Motion
AI Thread Summary
Ferlini's acceleration is calculated to be 76.875 m/s² based on his launch from a cannon with a velocity of 12.3 m/s over a time of 0.16 seconds. The discussion also includes a calculation of John's acceleration while sliding down a hill, which is found to be 0.63 m/s² after converting his speed from km/h to m/s. Additionally, participants discuss the concept of acceleration, clarifying that it can occur without an increase in speed if the direction changes. There is confusion regarding the calculation of a falling object's height, emphasizing the need for understanding displacement equations in accelerated motion. The conversation highlights the importance of reviewing physics concepts for clarity in problem-solving.
cherryrocket
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
1. Q: "John slides down on a hill on his toboggan. He starts from rest and speeds up to 18.0 km/h in 8.0 s. Find his acceleration in m/s^2."
A: Convert 18.0 km/h to m/s^2 = 18.0 km/h(0.2778) = 5.00 m/s
a=v/t = 5.00m/s / 8.0s = 0.63 m/s^2

2.Q: Explain how you can accelerate without speeding up.
A: By changing direction when you accelerate. Ex. turning around a corner (I'm not really getting this explanation)

3. An object falls off a cliff and lands 3.85 s later. How high is the cliff?
A: I don't know how to get it, there is only on number given, I don't have any other numbers to put in the average acceleration equation.

4.Q: "Ferlini the human cannonball is shot out of a 2.80 m long cannon with a velocity of 12.3 m/s. Find his acceleration."
A: Is 2.80 m the distance? I don't think it is because it is just what he was shot out off, not the distance covered.
But this is what I did anyway:
t= d/v = 2.0m/12.3m/s = 0.16s = 0.2s

Then I looked for the acceleration:
a=v/t =12.3m/s / 0.2s = 61.5 m/s^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. looks good to me.

For 2, yes that is the right explanation. Acceleration is a change in velocity. Velocity is a magnitude and direction. But speed is just the magnitude of velocity. So if velocity keeps the same magnitude but changes direction... that means that speed remains the same, but velocity changes.

For 3, try to apply the equation d = v1*t + (1/2)at^2

For 4, Ferlini is accelerating from 0 to 12.3m/s over a distance of 2.80m. ie: he is accelerated from rest to 12.3m/s over a distance of 2.80m (which is the length of the cannon) before being fired out of the cannon.

d = v*t can't be used here unless v is average velocity... in other words, the correct equation is:

d = \frac{(vi + vf)}{2}*t

using this equation, you can proceed the same way you did to get the acceleration. ie: get the time, then get acceleration...

Also, there's another displacement equation you can use to directly get acceleration, without solving for time first.

either way of doing the problem is fine. one way is just a little quicker than the other.
 
Confused!

learningphysics said:
For 3, try to apply the equation d = v1*t + (1/2)at^2

so, what you did was rearrange vi=d-1/2at^2 / t, right?

d= (0m/s)(3.85s) + (1/2)a(3.85s)^2
= 0 + 7.41a
= 7.41a

but I still can't find a because I don't have the average velocity. I'm so confused...
 
cherryrocket said:
so, what you did was rearrange vi=d-1/2at^2 / t, right?

d= (0m/s)(3.85s) + (1/2)a(3.85s)^2
= 0 + 7.41a
= 7.41a

but I still can't find a because I don't have the average velocity. I'm so confused...

Haven't you seen the equation d = v_i*t + (1/2)at^2 before? This is one of the equations for displacement with accelerated motion...

there are others also, such as

d= \frac{(v_i + v_f)}{2}*t

and

v_f^2 = v_i^2 + 2ad

if these don't seem familiar be sure to look them over in your textbook...

Also, you do have the acceleration... what is the acceleration of an object that is falling?
 
Yes, I think that perhaps I should read over the whole chapter on Accelerated Motion before trying to do this module. Well, thanks anyway.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top