A capacitor in an AC circuit. What is the amplitude of the current?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the amplitude of the current in an AC circuit involving a capacitor. The original poster expresses confusion about calculating the current amplitude without using specific curve fit equations and provides measured values for capacitance and voltage.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between voltage and current in a capacitor, questioning how to define a capacitor as a function of time. Some suggest using the derivative of charge with respect to time to find current, while others discuss the implications of using Euler's formula in circuit analysis.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various insights and approaches to the problem. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of voltage functions and the relationship between current and voltage in capacitive circuits, but no consensus has been reached on a specific method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of AC circuit analysis, including the definitions of reactance and impedance, while also considering the implications of missing information regarding resistance in the circuit.

mrknowknow
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
A capacitor in an AC circuit. What is the amplitude of the current??

Homework Statement



I really do not know how to approach this problem. What confuses me is that when calculating the % error I'm suppose to have a theoretical or accepted value and a measured value. So how do I determine the amplitude of the current without using the 2 curve fit equations from the lab quest.

My measured capacitance is 1.7E-6F
My working voltage measured at the start of the lab is 4.02V

Homework Equations



LabQuest2 data

deltaV=5.6cos(376.87x+1.31)+.074
I=.0048cos(379.57x+2.8)-6.1E-4




The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Did you measure or do you know the resistance in the circuit?

Can you define a capacitor as a function of time t (or x in this case)?
 
Firstly, thank you paisiello for taking the time out to reply.

This particular procedure in the lab just consisted of the capacitor and the power supply.

I don't know if this is right but I divided the voltage by the capacitive reactance to get 3.6E-3

(5.59V)/(Xc) Xc=1/wC =1/(2[itex]\pi[/itex]60Hz*(1.7E-3)=1560.34 Ohms
 
I don't think that is going to do it.

Back to my 2nd question: Can you define a capacitor as a function of time t (or x in this case)?
 
Vc=Vcos(wx)

Ic=[itex]\omega[/itex]CVcos([itex]\omega[/itex]x+[itex]\pi[/itex]/2)

?
 
Last edited:
Start from the basic definition of a capacitor and relate this to the basic definition of current. From this you should be able to get a theoretical current based on the voltage measurement you made.
 
@mrknowknow
What paisiello is getting at involves a derivative of something with respect to something, and you normally use it in time dependent analysis. ;)
 
A capacitor in an AC circuit. What is the amplitude of the current??

I=dQ/dt
 
There you go. And what's that equal to?
 
  • #10
Ok, well, with an alternating current circuit, you know that your ##\omega## values will always be constant when running between current and voltage, so that's pretty helpful. Also, it looks like you are mentioning complex reactance, so you should be able to use Euler's formula to help you solve this problem pretty easily.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_formula

(If you don't know this formula, get very handy with it if you are studying circuits)

So, using this information, I assume you already know the equation for the current over a capacitor.

$$ I = C \frac{dV}{dt}$$

And this is all you need in order to solve this problem. Euler's Formula and the equation for current over a capacitor.

Theoretically, the voltage/current in a circuit is defined as the real portion of Euler's formula, which is why the cosine function is always used. So, if you are given a function in terms of just the cosine function, you can rewrite this using Euler's formula, keeping in mind that there is an "imaginary" portion of current that flows through a circuit.

So, say your voltage takes the form $$V(t) = V_{m}\cos(\omega t + \phi)$$

You can actually rewrite this in terms of Euler's formula as $$V_{m}e^{\jmath (\omega t +\phi)}$$

From here, you know how to separate variables in an exponent I'm sure. You should try to use this voltage value to now plug into the formula for the current of a capacitor. You'll notice that, after taking your derivatives and separating your exponents, the part of your equation that is $$V_{m}e^{\jmath \omega t}$$ is actually going to cancel.

In circuits, this is known as solving your problem in the "frequency domain" because your equations are no longer time dependent. This is the underlying principle of using phasor currents and voltages.

Now, impedance is defined as having two parts: the real part and the complex part. The real part is called resistance, and the complex part is called reactance, which I imagine you've learned. In this circuit, you'll notice you only have reactance. Typically, your phase angle is the inverse tangent of your reactance divided by your resistance, but you can solve for your phase angle in this circuit by using the method I outlined above.

Just keep in mind that the imaginary number ##\jmath## is the same thing as $$e^{\jmath \frac{\pi}{2}}$$ and by using simple algebra to simplify your exponents, you can solve for your phase angle, the magnitude of you impedance, and for both the function of your voltage and current.
 
  • #11
Rellek said:
So, say your voltage takes the form $$V(t) = V_{m}\cos(\omega t + \phi)$$

You can actually rewrite this in terms of Euler's formula as $$V_{m}e^{\jmath (\omega t +\phi)}$$

No. $$V(t) = V_{m}\cos(\omega t + \phi)$$ grants
##V(t)=\frac{e^{i(\omega t + \phi)} + e^{-i(\omega t + \phi)}}{2}##

or

##V(t)=Real(e^{i(\omega t + \phi)})##
but I don't particularly like this method because this is also true:
##V(t)=Real(e^{-i(\omega t + \phi)})##
Also, this site has ["spoiler"]["/spoiler"] tags for a reason.
 
  • #12
I used i vs. j just to clarify. Same thing, but I think engineers prefer j and physicists/mathmeticians prefer i at least in my experience.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K