A circle tranforming into ellipse

  • Thread starter Thread starter vin300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Ellipse
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the geometric transformation of a circle into an ellipse when projected onto an inclined plane. The relationship between the angle of inclination and the ellipse's eccentricity is established, with the semi-major axis equal to the circle's radius and the semi-minor axis defined as rcosθ. The user seeks a mathematical proof that demonstrates how the non-uniform scaling of a circle results in an elliptical shape. They conceptualize the projection as a cylinder intersected by the inclined plane. The inquiry emphasizes the need for a formal proof of this geometric transformation.
vin300
Messages
602
Reaction score
4
I don't know what category this question falls into. I have two parallel planes, on one I draw a circle and on the other I project it orthogonally. Now I incline the plane with the circle. The projection on the other plane will be an ellipse. I need to find out, the relationship between the angle of inclination and the eccentricity of the ellipse.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I've figured it out. If a is the semi-major axis, b is the semi-minor axis of the ellipse and r is the radius of the circle, then a= r and b= rcosθ (θ is the angle of inclination). Now it isn't difficult to find the eccentricity of the ellipse. But.. how to prove that an inclined projection of a circle is an ellipse in the first place?
 
Look at the projection of a circle between parallel planes as a cylinder. then the angle of the second plane intersects the cylinder.
 
I was looking for a mathematical proof of "a non-uniform scaling of a circle changes its shape into an ellipse".
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top