A couple few things I've always wondered:

  • Thread starter Thread starter WatermelonPig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Couple
WatermelonPig
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
Just a couple tricks which are obviously incorrect, but why?

6/2 = 3

(-2)^3 = -8

(A^B)^C = A^(BC)

(-2)^3 = ((-2)^6)^(1/2) = (64)^(1/2) = 8

1/-1 = -1/1

sqrt(1/-1) = sqrt(-1/1)

1/i = i/1 And then multiply both sides by i

1 = -1

So what is happening here.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
2=\sqrt{4}=2^{1/2}=((-2)^2)^{1/2}=-2^{2/2}=-2.

See here for an explanation.
 
WatermelonPig said:
Just a couple tricks which are obviously incorrect, but why?

6/2 = 3

(-2)^3 = -8

(A^B)^C = A^(BC)

(-2)^3 = ((-2)^6)^(1/2) = (64)^(1/2) = 8

1/-1 = -1/1

sqrt(1/-1) = sqrt(-1/1)

1/i = i/1 And then multiply both sides by i

1 = -1

So what is happening here.

"Read Euler, Read Euler, he's master of us all".
Read Euler's elements of Algebra. he has explained all these in his treatise on Algebra.
the last one is incorrect because sqrt(A)sqrt(B) = sqrt(AB) is not valid for all complex numbers. (It is valid for real numbers though, but if we think of them as functions then these two functions are not equal because they can have different domains).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top