A cylinder rolling down an incline

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of a cylinder rolling down an inclined plane using both Lagrangian mechanics and Newtonian mechanics. Participants explore the forces involved, particularly the role of static friction, and the relationship between linear and angular motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the acceleration of the cylinder using Lagrangian mechanics and arrives at \dfrac{2}{3} g sin( \theta ), questioning its correctness.
  • Another participant outlines the steps to apply Newton's laws, emphasizing the need to identify forces, including friction, and to consider both translational and rotational motion.
  • A participant expresses confusion about calculating the static frictional force, noting that the cylinder is not slipping and questioning how to compute this force.
  • A later reply clarifies that the speed of the cylinder relates to its radius and angular velocity, which resolves some confusion for the original poster.
  • Another participant reiterates the importance of calculating the friction force through force equations, highlighting that static friction depends on the angle of inclination.
  • One participant confirms the need to use Newton's Second Law for rotating bodies and expresses satisfaction in finding agreement between the Newtonian and Lagrangian approaches.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the calculation of static friction, with some expressing uncertainty about its computation while others provide insights. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific details of applying Newtonian mechanics.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the dependency of static friction on the angle of inclination and the relationship between linear and angular motion, but do not fully resolve the implications of these factors in the calculations.

arunma
Messages
924
Reaction score
4
So here's a pretty straightforward question. Given a cylinder with some specific mass and radius rolling down an inclined plane with a specific angle of inclination, what is the cylinder's acceleration?

I can figure out the answer pretty easily by finding the Lagrangian of the cylinder (I worked it out to [tex]\dfrac{2}{3} g sin( \theta )[/tex], someone let me know if that's wrong). But what's bugging me is that I can't remember how to do this problem using regular Newtonian mechanics. Can anyone help me out of this brain fart? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The usual suspects:
(1) Identify the forces acting on the cylinder (don't forget friction)
(2) Write Newton's 2nd law for translation
(3) Write Newton's 2nd law for rotation
(4) Include the constraint of rolling without slipping
(5) Solve!
 
It's number 1 that's eluding me at the moment (which is really bugging me, since this is supposedly something that a freshman can do). There is a static frictional force at the base of the cylinder. But since the cylinder isn't at the point of slipping, how can this be computed?
 
Wow, I just realized the source of my brain fart. I had forgotten that the speed of the cylinder is equal to its radius time the angular velocity. That clears everything up. Thanks!
 
arunma said:
It's number 1 that's eluding me at the moment (which is really bugging me, since this is supposedly something that a freshman can do). There is a static frictional force at the base of the cylinder. But since the cylinder isn't at the point of slipping, how can this be computed?
I'm sure you've figured it out for yourself by now, but just for the record: You calculate the friction force by solving the force equations. The amount of static friction depends upon the angle (as you realize, you certainly cannot assume that friction equals [itex]\mu N[/itex]).
 
Last edited:
Doc Al said:
I'm sure you've figured it out for yourself by now, but just for the record: You calculate the friction force by solving the force equations. The amount of static friction depends upon the angle (as you realize, you certainly cannot assume that friction equals [itex]\mu N[/itex]).

Yup, it turns out I need to use Newton's Second Law for rotating bodies. Anyway, I figured it out. And it's always satisfying to see that the Newtonian and Lagrangian methods agree!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
4K