Iacchus32
- 2,315
- 1
Have you bothered to read any of this thread? Your condescending attitude really sucks man!Originally posted by Another God
Perfact, that's all you needed to say. If you had have said to FZ "But I believe Man and Nature are the same: And here are my reasons" rather than constantly arguing from above that assumption, than many many posts in this thread could have been avoided.
Now, with that in mind, do you wish to continue this thread with the basic assumption that Man is outisde of nature, or do you want to address the fact that (at least) FZ+ and I disagree with this assumption, and start from there?
The choice is yours, and I am sure FZ would be just as willing as I am to accommodate both options (in the first case, we would probably both just leave the thread, while in the second instance we would be willing to explain why it is that we believe man to be a part of nature, and await your reasons for believing that man is not part of nature.)
Well, maybe I didn't quite spell it out here either, but it certainly alludes to the same! Can you tell me that it doesn't suggest the same? Also, I've had this conversation with FZ+ before, and he knows that I don't have a problem with evolution per se'. Which, is one reason I couldn't understand why he wasn't picking up on what I was saying?Originally posted by Iacchus32
I think "estranged" from the whole process is probably the best way to put it? Indeed I think it's indicative to a basic flaw in the theory that we merely arrived here by natural selection alone, not that I believe the whole theory is invalid ...
Does this suggest anything to the contrary? Once again I am obviously making "that distinction" here.Originally posted by Iacchus32
No, the key here is are we really natural to the environment? ... If not, then "who" put us here?
Once again, alluding to the fact that we are not natural to the environment.Originally posted by Iacchus32
It sounds to me a bit like playing God which, is supposedly the reason we were kicked out of the Garden of Eden in the first place!![]()
This does not allude to the same thing?Originally posted by Iacchus32
Another evolutionary mechanism? What was wrong with the first one? And why is it that we only associate the latter with the Advent of Modern Man? Again, what makes "us" so special?
This does not allude to the same thing?Originally posted by Iacchus32
Let's say it's supposed to represent man's fall from grace (by playing God), by which he becomes subjected to -- and hence "struggles with" -- nature.
This does not allude to the same thing?Originally posted by Iacchus32
No, I'm just as "addicted" to all this man-made stuff as anyone else. And yet if we continue to stress that this whole current state-of-affairs came about "naturally" -- which is to say there's very little we can do about it, and it's okay to remain complacent -- then at some point we're going to be in for the biggest shock of our lives. Nature did not bring us to our current predicament.
NOTE: The Timeline material has been relocated to the following thread, A Spiritual Timeline / The Church of Man.