Proving Symmetric Operators are Equal: A Functional Analysis Challenge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that if A is a symmetric operator, A includes B, and the ranges of A + iI and B + iI are equal, then A must equal B. The solution involves showing that both operators have the same domain and leveraging the properties of symmetric operators and their adjoints. It is established that since A is symmetric, B must also be symmetric due to A's inclusion. The conclusion drawn is that the equality of ranges leads to the equality of domains, confirming that A equals B. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding operator properties in functional analysis.
johan_munchen
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A functional analysis' problem

I hope this is the right place to submit this post.

Homework Statement


Let A be a symmetric operator, A\supseteq B and \mathcal{R}_{A+\imath I}=\mathcal{R}_{B+\imath I} (where \mathcal{R} means the range of the operator). Show that A=B.

2. The attempt at a solution
If A is symmetric, then A\subseteq A^*, where A^* is the adjoint of A, and from A\supseteq B one can deduce that also B is symmetric. The definition domains of A and B are dense in \mathcal{H} (\mathcal{H} an Hilbert space), so \mathcal{N}_{(A+\imath I)^*}=(\mathcal{R}_{A+\imath I})^\perp, where now \mathcal{N} is the operator's kernel. An idea to complete the exercise should be showing that A^*\supseteq B^*, using the identity \mathcal{N}_{(A+\imath I)^*}=\mathcal{N}_{(B+\imath I)^*} and the previous hypothesis. However, I can't understand how this could be usefull.

Thanks a lot for your help. JM
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Is it possible to move this post to the "Introductory Physics" section?
 


johan_munchen said:
Is it possible to move this post to the "Introductory Physics" section?

No need, functional analysis is mathematics. :smile:

Anyway, take a point a in the domain of definition of A. Let's calculate Aa+ia, what does \mathcal{R}_{A+iI}=\mathcal{R}_{B+iI} tell you now?
 
For hypothesis A\supseteq B so \mathcal{D}_A\supseteq\mathcal{D}_B and A\mathbf{x}=B\mathbf{x}\,\,\forall\,\mathbf{x}\in \mathcal{D}_B. Let \mathbf{a}\in\mathcal{D}_A then A\mathbf{a}+\imath \mathbf{a}\in\mathcal{H}. For hypothesis \mathcal{R}_{A+\imath I}=\mathcal{R}_{B+\imath I}, so \exists\,\mathbf{y}\in\mathcal{H}\,:\,\mathbf{y}=A\mathbf{a}+\imath I\mathbf{a}=B\mathbf{a}+\imath I\mathbf{a}, then B\mathbf{a}+\imath I\mathbf{a}\in\mathcal{H}, which means that \mathbf{a} is also an element of \mathcal{D}_B. So \mathcal{D}_A=\mathcal{D}_B, in other words A=B. I have thought about this but I was trying to use the symmetry hypotesis about A.
 
Last edited:
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top