A A fundamental question about research

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of natural units (c=h=g=1) in research, with participants noting its prevalence among researchers. Some argue that using these units simplifies calculations, while others prefer traditional units for clarity and physical understanding. One contributor highlights their approach of using MKS-SI units or concepts independent of unit choice, emphasizing the importance of maintaining clarity in calculations. The conversation also touches on the practicality of using natural units in specific areas, such as quantum information theory and experimental particle physics. Overall, the preference for or against using natural units varies based on individual research contexts and the desire for comparability across different fields.

Are you using c=h=g=1?

  • yes, I do

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • No, I don't

    Votes: 4 57.1%

  • Total voters
    7
MacRudi
Messages
98
Reaction score
12
When you are in research behind your desk, are you using c=h=g=1?
I think this is common now. Everyone is doing it.
Is there anyone, who is not doing it?
And if, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't do it because keeping units in my calculations makes them easier for me to understand on a physical level (I either use MKS-SI units, or work on concepts independent of choice of units (as in quantum information theory)).
But then, the theory work I do is simple enough that there isn't enough savings to be worth it.
If I want to avoid hbar, I consider frequency and wavenumber instead of energy and momentum.
 
##c=1## always (GeV is energy, mass and momentum), ##\hbar=1## sometimes (decay widths for short-living particles in MeV), ##g=1## never (doesn't help in experimental particle physics).
 
Currently, I don't but I will once I move to my next lab, where I will most likely work with the atomic units (in which ##\hbar=1##). Honestly, I don't like those inventions on unit since it makes comparison with the other result reported in papers in a different field of research indirect, and requires a calculator.
 
thanks for your answers
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top