A galilean puzzle in electromagnetism

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a "Galilean puzzle" in electromagnetism, specifically focusing on the dynamics of a charged particle in a magnetic field while influenced by an electric field. Participants explore the implications of applying a Galilean boost to the Lagrangian of the system and whether this transformation can simplify the electric field components in the equations of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the setup involving a charged particle in a magnetic field and an electric field, noting the resulting drift velocity of the particle.
  • Another participant suggests that a Galilean boost may not eliminate the electric field terms from the Lagrangian, as it introduces a time-dependent term due to the magnetic potential.
  • A participant proposes that a Lorentz transformation, rather than a Galilean one, would be necessary for complete cancellation of terms.
  • There is a claim that the initial Lagrangian is Galilean invariant, which is relevant for non-relativistic systems, and that the new Lagrangian includes a total time derivative of a scalar function.
  • One participant speculates that the additional term from the Galilean boost might be negligible in the non-relativistic limit.
  • A caution is raised that if the particle's trajectory is not a perfect spiral, it may not be possible to eliminate the electric field entirely.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether a Galilean boost can simplify the electric field terms in the Lagrangian, with some arguing for the necessity of a Lorentz transformation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of the Galilean invariance and the treatment of the additional terms.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion is situated within a non-relativistic framework, which may affect the applicability of certain transformations and the treatment of terms in the Lagrangian.

phoenix85
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A "galilean puzzle" in electromagnetism

Well, I still didn't managed to find the answer, since the puzzle seems a little bit more involved than I first tought...to perform the computations, you only need to know a little bit about lagrangian/hamiltonian dynamics in electromagnetism.

Consider a charged particle moving in a plane perpendicular to a homogeneous (constant) magnetic field (B=[0,0,B]), and with an electric field lying in the plane (E=[Ex,Ey,0]). One can write down the related lagrangian (using the symmetric gauge) and get the equations of motion. If the electric field was not present, we get the cyclotron motion, but in presence of such an electric field, one can show that the particle will be drifting with the speed of the "guiding center", v=ExB/B².

Now, the question : compute the transformed lagrangian under the galilean boost defined by the speed of this guiding center, in order to simplify the electric field components. Will such a galilean boost eliminate the electric field terms from the lagrangian ?

Well, I tried to do it on the paper, but from the galilean boost I get a term depending on time in the new lagrangian (because of the magnetic potential) !?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


phoenix85 said:
Well, I still didn't managed to find the answer, since the puzzle seems a little bit more involved than I first tought...to perform the computations, you only need to know a little bit about lagrangian/hamiltonian dynamics in electromagnetism.

Consider a charged particle moving in a plane perpendicular to a homogeneous (constant) magnetic field (B=[0,0,B]), and with an electric field lying in the plane (E=[Ex,Ey,0]). One can write down the related lagrangian (using the symmetric gauge) and get the equations of motion. If the electric field was not present, we get the cyclotron motion, but in presence of such an electric field, one can show that the particle will be drifting with the speed of the "guiding center", v=ExB/B².

Now, the question : compute the transformed lagrangian under the galilean boost defined by the speed of this guiding center, in order to simplify the electric field components. Will such a galilean boost eliminate the electric field terms from the lagrangian ?

Well, I tried to do it on the paper, but from the galilean boost I get a term depending on time in the new lagrangian (because of the magnetic potential) !?

To obtain a complete cancelling you have to make the Lorentz transformation (not Galilean) that involves the time variable too.

Bob.
 


Bob_for_short said:
To obtain a complete cancelling you have to make the Lorentz transformation (not Galilean) that involves the time variable too.

Bob.

This is also what I thought, but I've been told that the initial lagrangian is galilean invariant, since this is a non-relativistic system. To be more precise about that, when computing the new lagrangian, one gets the old lagrangian plus the total time derivative of a given scalar function (the latter is relevant to enforce the invariance of the Schrödinger equation under the galilean boosts, since the function itself will have to appear as a phase into the transformed wave function).
 


phoenix85 said:
This is also what I thought, but I've been told that the initial lagrangian is galilean invariant, since this is a non-relativistic system. To be more precise about that, when computing the new lagrangian, one gets the old lagrangian plus the total time derivative of a given scalar function (the latter is relevant to enforce the invariance of the Schrödinger equation under the galilean boosts, since the function itself will have to appear as a phase into the transformed wave function).

Then, maybe, the additional term you get could be neglected in the non-relativistic limit.

Bob.

P.S. If the curve is not a perfect spiral, you cannot eliminate the electric field, I am afraid.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K