Trying to understand electromagnetic waves

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the propagation of electromagnetic waves and the complexities involved in understanding their behavior. The participant, Agustin, clarifies that an electromagnetic wave is a self-propagating disturbance in an electromagnetic field, distinct from the field of the radiating particle. The conversation also addresses the calculation of the "Eo" value in the wave equation for monochromatic plane waves and the need for resources that cover spherical wave treatments. The mathematical explanation provided illustrates the significance of retardation in electromagnetic fields and how it affects potential calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic fields and waves
  • Familiarity with wave equations and their components
  • Basic knowledge of scalar potential in electrodynamics
  • Concept of retardation in wave propagation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the wave equation for electromagnetic waves
  • Learn about the calculation of the amplitude "Eo" in wave equations
  • Research spherical wave propagation and its mathematical treatment
  • Explore advanced texts on electrodynamics that cover both plane and spherical waves
USEFUL FOR

Students and self-learners in physics, particularly those studying electrodynamics, as well as educators seeking to deepen their understanding of electromagnetic wave propagation and its mathematical foundations.

Agustin.R
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm having some trouble understanding visually the propagation of an electromagnetic wave. I'm self-studying electrodynamics so I've never had someone explain this properly to me.

I understand an electromagnetic wave is a propagating disturbance in an electromagnetic field. Originally, I thought this is a change in the radiating particle's field, so I was puzzled why wouldn't the wave fall off like r^2 like the electric field does. So I'm thinking that the electromagnetic wave is a separate, self-propagating electromagnetic field, distinct from the particle's field (or at least the field at the retarded time in which the particle radiated). Is this the meaning of "a changing electric field generating a magnetic field, and a changing magnetic field generating an electric one"?

Additionally, I don't understand what is the "Eo" value in the wave equation for a monochromatic plane wave. I know this is the amplitude, but I don't understand how I would calculate it.

Finally, most books I see have only a treatment of plane waves. Could anyone recommend me a book with a good treatment of spherical ones?

Thank you in advance for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Agustin, This can lead to complicated math in a hurry, so I'll talk about about a simplified situation. Suppose you have two point charges located at z = +a and z = -a, and suppose the charges are equal and opposite and their magnitude varies sinusoidally: Q = ± Q0 eiωt. In between them there is a thin resistance-free wire that carries the current back and forth.

Let the field point be a distance r from the origin, and distances ra, rb from the charges. Look at the scalar potential, which depends only on the charges, not the current. It's like 1/r:

φ = Q0 [eiωt/ra - eiωt/rb]

But that's wrong: we ignored the effect of retardation. Changes in the field propagate outward at the speed of light, and φ reflects the value of each charge at the retarded time. So φ is really:

φ = Q0 [eiω(t-ra/c)/ra - eiω(t- rb/c)/rb]

Let ω = ck, and for utter simplicity take a field point somewhere on the z-axis, so that ra = r + a, rb = r - a.

φ = Q0 eikct -ikr[e-ika/(r+a) - e+ika/(r-a)]

Expand this, assuming the charges are close together: a << r and ka << 1. The leading terms are:

φ = Q0 eikct -ikr[-2ika/r - 2a/r2]

(I hope I got that right.) Anyway the point is, when k ≠ 0 (time-varying) the potential goes like 1/r, and when k=0 (static) the 1/r term is missing and the potential goes like 1/r2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K