A Gedanken Experiment Regarding Bell's Theorem and Nonlocality

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on a Gedanken experiment illustrating Bell's Theorem and nonlocality using an analogy of entangled boxes containing socks. The experiment demonstrates that predetermined sock colors yield different outcomes 66.67% of the time, while indeterminate colors, as suggested by quantum theory, result in different colors 100% of the time. The conversation highlights the confusion surrounding the number of entangled particles, with a suggestion to simplify the example to two entangled particles instead of four boxes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bell's Theorem
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics and entanglement
  • Familiarity with the concept of nonlocality in physics
  • Knowledge of photon spin and its representation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Bell's Theorem in quantum mechanics
  • Study the concept of quantum entanglement and its experimental verification
  • Explore the differences between classical and quantum probabilities
  • Learn about the role of nonlocality in quantum theory and its philosophical implications
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of quantum theory and the implications of entanglement and nonlocality.

Gary Boothe
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
A GEDANKEN EXPERIMENT REGARDING BELL'S THEOREM AND NONLOCALITYLet’s say I have four boxes with three compartments in each one, and each compartment contains either a white sock or a black sock. This is analogous to photons having spin components either clockwise or counterclockwise (black or white socks) around three perpendicular axes (the three compartments).

There are only four different sets of possible “entangled” boxes, analogous to entangled photons. I can represent the four sets of entangled boxes as:

Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4

B W B W B W B W

B W B W W B W B

B W W B B W W B

The boxes are "entangled" in that if a black sock is in the left top compartment of a box, the sock must be white in the right top compartment of the other box, and so on for each of the four possible sets of boxes.

Let’s say I keep one box in a set and mail the other one to you. For this box and every one I send to you, we open only one compartment at a time at random. After opening our compartments at random, we then compare the colors of our socks.

With the first possible set of boxes, If I open the top left box, you may open any of the three compartments to get a white sock, and the possible outcomes are BW,BW,BW, and of course this is repeated three times for a total of nine possible outcomes:

BW,BW,BW,BW,BW,BW,BW,BW,BW.

So, we get different colored socks 100% of the time.

For the second set of possible boxes, the possible outcomes when I open a compartment at random, and you open a compartment at random are:

BW,BW,BB,BW,BW,BB,WW,WW,WB.

So, we get different colored socks only 5 times out of 9, or 55.55% of the time.

For the third and fourth set of boxes, we also get different colored socks 55.55% of the time. So, if we randomly opened thousands of "entangled" boxes with predetermined colored socks, on average we will see different colored socks 66.67% of the time.

(100% + 55.55% + 55.55% + 55.55%)/4 = 66.67%

But what happens if the sock color is not predetermined, as quantum theory asserts? Would we get a different percentage of different colored socks? Yes, it is obvious that we would get different colored socks 100% of the time.

What I have shown above is that different results (66.67% and 100%) are obtained for entangled boxes when the colors of the socks are either predetermined (as in classical physics) or indeterminate (as in quantum theory). Isn't this the principle behind Bell's Theorem and the case for nonlocality, or am I completely off base? Any response would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gary,

There are a lot of issues with your question that make it impossible to answer in its current form. Usually for an example of this type, there are 2 entangled particles. So I don't follow what there is 4 of.

Also, electrons have spin along 3 non-commuting axes, but photons I would call it 2 instead. Probably we should shift to an example that we can all discuss, ok?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
7K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
8K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
8K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 220 ·
8
Replies
220
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
8K