A good physics book besides Giancoli?

AI Thread Summary
A high school junior is seeking effective resources to understand physics better, expressing dissatisfaction with the Giancoli textbook's focus on algebraic proofs over conceptual explanations. They are considering "Conceptual Physics" by Hewitt but are also intrigued by "The Feynman Lectures on Physics." Discussions highlight that many introductory physics books have similar approaches, suggesting that if one is unappealing, others likely will be too. Recommendations include "The Feynman Lectures," which are praised for their intuitive and philosophical approach rather than heavy mathematical emphasis. The student is curious about the prerequisites for understanding Feynman's work and whether it allows for deriving formulas independently. The conversation emphasizes the importance of applying knowledge practically, with a consensus that Feynman's lectures could provide a deeper understanding of physics concepts.
Kwally3
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey!
I'm a junior in high school who's curious and determined to figure and (and retain the knowledge afterwards) how the world works. I'm enrolled in AP physics (i think it was B) but i don't really like how things are explained in our Giancoli book. By no means is it a bad book but I think he focuses too much emphasis on algebraic proofs than explanations (i don't think memorizing formulas is a good way to understanding physics). So what are your recommendations? I'm taking calculus A right now and am proficient in that course.

is conceptual physics by Hewitt any good? I only have enough money to buy 1 book right now. Thanks for your input.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Most introductory physics books are about the same. Therefore, in my experience, if you do not like one, you do not like any of them.

Try:

The Feynman Lectures on Physics(unfortunately, about $200)

Walter Lewin's Youtube Lectures

and

http://physics.nmt.edu/~raymond/teaching.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well after a quick amazon search, i found used copies of the 3 volume set running from 60 dollars--paperback though. The reviewers all essentially say it's magical and I'm quite gravitated to buying them. However, how does feynman go about relaying his knowledge (uses extensive algebra? build on the concepts then explain how they are applied in the world?) and what prerequisites would i need to decipher them?
 
Kwally3 said:
Well after a quick amazon search, i found used copies of the 3 volume set running from 60 dollars--paperback though. The reviewers all essentially say it's magical and I'm quite gravitated to buying them. However, how does feynman go about relaying his knowledge (uses extensive algebra? build on the concepts then explain how they are applied in the world?) and what prerequisites would i need to decipher them?

Feynman uses intuition and philosophy, it is not very mathematically emphasized. It would let you "understand" physics.
 
Pinu7 said:
Feynman uses intuition and philosophy. . .

there's philosophy in physics??
I'm now super hyped. Unless no one else suggests anything by this afternoon, I'm going to purchase them.
When you say it's not mathematically emphasized, do you mean he provides you with the knowledge to derive formulas yourself?
And, just to suppress a side thought, it's definitely not one of those books that you have a great time reading but have no idea how
to apply the knowledge afterwards right?
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
171
Replies
26
Views
5K
Back
Top