MHB A line passing through two points

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Points
AI Thread Summary
To find the value of \( a \) for the point \( (a, 4, -3) \) on the line through points \( p = (1,2,-1) \) and \( q = (3,1,0) \), the correct calculation shows that \( a = -3 \). The line can be expressed parametrically as \( (x,y,z) = (1,2,-1) + t(2,-1,1) \). By solving the equations derived from the line's parameters, it is confirmed that \( t = -2 \) leads to \( a = -3 \). However, the initial methodology had inaccuracies, particularly regarding the relationship between the line and the plane generated by points \( p \) and \( q \). The final conclusion is that \( a = -3 \) is indeed correct.
Guest2
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
If the line passing through the points $p = (1,2,-1)$ and $q = (3,1,0)$ contains the point $(a, 4,-3)$ then what's the value of $a$?

I think $a = -3$. but I'm not sure.

$(1,2,-1)x+(3,1,0)y = (a,4,-3)$

$(x,2x,-x)+(3y,y,0) = (a,4,-3)$

$(x+3y, 2x+y, -x) = (a, 4,-3)$

so $x = -3$, $y = -2$ and $a = -3$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your answer is correct, although the methodology is not as good as you might hope.

Firstly, you have a typo, it should be $x = 3$.

Secondly, although the line going through $p$ and $q$ does lie in the plane generated by $p$ and $q$, it is not true that any point in the plane so generated lies on that line. So you kind of got lucky.

The line through $p$ and $q$ is:

$\{(x,y,z) \in \Bbb R^3: (x,y,z) = p + t(q-p), t \in \Bbb R\}$.

We have:

$q - p = (2,-1,1)$, so our line is:

$(1,2,-1) + t(2,-1,1)$

so: $(2t+1,2-t,t-1) = (a,4,-3)$

Either $2-t = 4$ or $t-1 = -3$ leads to $t = -2$, and consequently $a = 2t + 1 = 2(-2) + 1 = -4 + 1 = -3$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top