A parabolic force distribution is applied to a beam

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a parabolic force distribution applied to a beam, focusing on the integration of load functions and the implications of units in calculating moments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of a load function to find moments, questioning the units of the distributed load and whether it should be treated as N/m or N/m². There is also exploration of how to redefine variables to simplify the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the nature of the distributed load and its relation to calculating moments. There is ongoing exploration of the correct approach to integrating the load function and how to handle units effectively.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the units of the distributed load and the need for clarity on whether w(x) represents a distributed force. Participants are considering the implications of these definitions on their calculations.

theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


j9qRi.png


The Attempt at a Solution


So I noticed the units of w_0 were in N. In other words to find the moment I would have to integrate 100∫01 x2+1-2x dx. However I ended up with the wrong answer.

The correct answer requires that I integrate 100∫01 x2+1-2x x dx

However, if I do it this way I don't see how the units work out... Do you think this is a mistake? I think they wanted w_0 to be a distributed load with units N/m...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only math involved here is simple integration so I am moving this to the "physic homework" section.
 
theBEAST said:
So I noticed the units of w_0 were in N. In other words to find the moment I would have to integrate 100∫01 x2+1-2x dx. However I ended up with the wrong answer.
The units of w_0 are in N/m2. If you integrate 100∫01 x2+1-2x dx, you get force.

The correct answer requires that I integrate 100∫01 x2+1-2x x dx
I suppose you mean 100∫(01 x2+1-2x)x dx. Yes, you need to integrate this to find the moment.
 
theBEAST said:

Homework Statement


j9qRi.png


The Attempt at a Solution


So I noticed the units of w_0 were in N. In other words to find the moment I would have to integrate 100∫01 x2+1-2x dx. However I ended up with the wrong answer.

The correct answer requires that I integrate 100∫01 x2+1-2x x dx

However, if I do it this way I don't see how the units work out... Do you think this is a mistake? I think they wanted w_0 to be a distributed load with units N/m...

In problems of this type it is easier to re-define things a bit, so units do not get in the way. Say the distance is x meters (so x is dimensionless!). Then if the "constant" is w0 N, the constant w0 is also dimensionless. This will make everything work out more easily than the original choice where x is distance (so has attached units of meters) and where w0 is an initial constant with dimensions of N/m2.

Anyway, the point is that you want to match the first moments of the forces, so you want to match force × distance (this is NOT work!) on both sides.

RGV
 
Thanks everyone! So is w(x) a distributed force? In other words w(x)*dx gives us a small fraction of the force at a certain x and then we multiply this value by x to get the moment?
 
Yes, w(x) is a distributed loading. As you have pointed out the total force supplied by the loading is the integral of the load function along the length it passes over. This total load is then applied at the centroid of the area underneath the load curve in order to have the same net effect that the distributed load itself had on the beam. From here your problem becomes a simple moment balancing issue.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K