A picture, a plane and the flat terrain. Please explain.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating that the terrain in front of the Wright brothers' plane in a historic photo is flat. Participants suggest using visual clues from the photo, such as object dimensions and shadows, to infer the terrain's characteristics. They note that a photograph is a 2D representation of a 3D scene, making it difficult to ascertain ground level without additional context or measurements. While some argue that the natural setting of Kitty Hawk may not be entirely flat, others emphasize the importance of context in interpreting the image. Ultimately, determining the terrain's flatness requires more than just visual analysis from the photo alone.
simplex1
Messages
50
Reaction score
1
A problem of photogrammetry

How can be demonstrated that the terrain in front of the plane you see in the photo is flat and there is no slope going down there?


Dec-17-1903-Flyer1TakingOffFirstFlight120Feet.jpg

First flight, 120 feet in 12 seconds, 10:35 a.m, December 17, 1903; Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. Orville Wright at the controls.

If it helps you can download the entire large size image (TIFF 17.2mb ) here: http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/00652085/
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You use the clues in the photo - look at what the terrain consists of, objects on the terrain, and shadows.
Extrapolate from apparent height of the camera. It helps if you know the dimensions of some of the objects photographed.

In general a photograph is a 2D projection of a 3D structure, so information is lost.
You have to use other knowledge about the situation to recover the missing data.

The easy approach is just to look up the location the picture was taken and go there and measure (or use a geological survey).
Since it is a natural setting, the ground is unlikely to be "flat". For the first piloted etc flight, only the launch was level, using rails, s I see no reason to suspect the ground is all that flat for the entire course. But then, I've never been to Kitty Hawk, maybe it's a noteably flat place.

What do you need to know for?
 
Last edited:
I think that what the OP is after is if the ground is level or not, which you can't tell from a picture.
 
In general you cannot tell from a picture ... however in a picture of hills, to take an extreme example, it's a fair bet that the ground is not level.
There are other possible clues - some of them in the picture above - which can help.

But the context is important.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top