A polynomial of degree ≤ 2 ? what does this mean.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition and implications of polynomials of degree ≤ 2, specifically in the context of linear algebra problems. Participants explore the forms of such polynomials and the significance of their coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equivalence of different polynomial forms and question the implications of using various coefficients. They also explore the distinction between polynomials of degree = 2 and those of degree ≤ 2, including how to approach problems involving these definitions.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into polynomial forms and their coefficients. Some guidance has been offered regarding the necessity of including a term for the highest degree in the polynomial, while others express confusion about selecting the appropriate form for specific problems.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference a specific problem from a linear algebra class that requires finding polynomials of degree ≤ 2 that pass through given points and meet certain conditions. There is an emphasis on understanding how to set up the polynomial correctly based on its degree.

mahrap
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
A polynomial of degree ≤ 2 ? what does this mean.


Would it just be

a + bt + c t^2 = f(t)

Or

at^2 + bt + c = f(t)

Is there even a difference between the two equations considering the fact that a,b, and c are unknown?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no difference in whether you had

[tex]f(t)=at^2+bt+c[/tex]

or

[tex]f(t)=ct^2+bt+a[/tex]

or

[tex]f(t)=xt^2+yt+z[/tex]

But the first is customary, and the last is using letters that usually denote variables as opposed to constants, so unless you have a good reason to otherwise deviate from the first, just stick with that.

Also, with any polynomial of degree n, the leading coefficient (coefficient of tn) must be non-zero, else the polynomial will no longer be degree n. Since you have a polynomial of degree [itex]\leq[/itex] 2, that means the leading coefficient of t2 does not have to be non-zero. You could even have all coefficients equal to 0 and thus simply have f(t)=0.
 
So what is the difference between a polynomial with degree = 2 and a polynomial with degree ≤ 2 or in general what is the difference between a polynomial with degree = 2 vs a polynomial with degree ≤ n ?
 
mahrap said:
So what is the difference between a polynomial with degree = 2
f(t) = at2 + bt + c, a 2nd-degree polynomial, also called a quadratic polynomial.
mahrap said:
and a polynomial with degree ≤ 2
Degree ≤ 2 would also include 1st degree polynomials, such as g(t) = at + b, or zero-degree polynomials, such as h(t) = a.
mahrap said:
or in general what is the difference between a polynomial with degree = 2 vs a polynomial with degree ≤ n ?
I assume you mean degree = n vs. degree ≤ n. An nth degree polynomial has to have a term in which the variable has an exponent of n. A polynomial of degree ≤ n includes lower-degree polynomials.
 
Yes sorry for the typo. I meant to say degree = n. The reason I started this thread was with regards to a problem in my linear algebra class where the problem states:

Find all polynomials f(t) of degree ≤ 2 whose graphs run through the points (1,3) and (2,6) , such that f`(1) = 1 .

When I started to solve the problem I used the form f(t) = a + bt + ct^2 for my polynomial and after solving the matrices I got c = 2. However when I checked the solutions in the back of the book they had a = 2 which makes sense because they used f(t) = at^2 + bt + c . So what confused me was, how is one suppose to know which form to use to get the right a or c even though both essentially yield the same variables considering 2 is the value of the variable in front of the t^2 term. In general you mentioned a polynomial of degree ≤ n includes lower-degree polynomials. According to that statement, how would I know to use f(t) = at^2 + bt + c or f(t) = at + c when setting up my system of equations?
 
Since the polynomial is of degree [itex]\leq[/itex] 2, that means the degree can at most be 2, so you should have [itex]f(t)=at^2+bt+c[/itex] which also ensures that even if the polynomial is just degree 1, then a=0. If you used [itex]f(t)=at+b[/itex] or [itex]f(t)=a[/itex] then you're assuming the equation must be of that form, and you'll soon find that there is no possible solution to the question if you begin with the assumption that the polynomials are of degree [itex]\leq[/itex] 1, or equivalently, [itex]f(t)=at+b[/itex].
 
If f(t) is a "polynomial of degree 2 or less" it can be written in the form [itex]at^2+ bt+ c[/itex] where a, b, and c can be any numbers.

If f(t) is a "polynomial of degree 2" it can be written in the form [itex]at^2+ bt+ c[/itex] where a, b, and c can be any numbers- except that a cannot be 0.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K