A proof within a proof (S.O.S. DUE TOMMORROW)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to uniform convergence, specifically focusing on proving a certain inequality involving a function and its limit. The original poster expresses difficulty in demonstrating the inequality |xx - 1/2n - x| < 1/2n for x in the interval [0, 1].

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of the original poster's proof attempt, questioning the implications of the term x^(-1/2^n) when x equals 0. There are attempts to clarify the behavior of the expression under specific conditions, and some participants suggest that the original proof may be flawed.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants raising questions about the assumptions made in the original proof attempt. Some guidance has been offered regarding the behavior of the terms involved, particularly when x is at the boundaries of the defined interval. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need to show uniform convergence and the constraints of the problem, including the requirement to demonstrate the inequality for x within the interval [0, 1]. The original poster has indicated urgency due to an impending deadline.

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12
A proof within a proof (S.O.S.! URGENT! DUE tomorrow!)

Homework Statement



So I'm stuck in the middle of a problem about uniform convergence. Nevermind what the problem asks, but please help me show

0 \leq x \leq 1 -----> |xx-1/2n-x| < 1/2n

Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



Multiply each side by something, subtract both sides by something, etc. I've tried that time and time again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I know you said we should not worry about the question but it seems like what you are trying to prove is flawed .

|xx^{\frac{-1}{2^n}} -x |What happens when x=0 ?

The term x^((-1/2)^n) is not really defined.Perhaps you should post the complete problem since there might be as better way of going about the proof.
 


╔(σ_σ)╝ said:
I know you said we should not worry about the question but it seems like what you are trying to prove is flawed .

|xx^{\frac{-1}{2^n}} -x |


What happens when x=0 ?

Isn't it 0?
 


Dickfore said:
Isn't it 0?

What about the X^(-1/2^n) term ?
 


Isn't it zero as well?
 


X^(-1/2^n) = 1/ X^(1/2^n)
 


Oh, god. I completely overlooked the fact that the exponent is negative.

EDIT:

But the term is:

<br /> x x^{-1/2^{n}} = x^{1 - 1/2^{n}} = 0, \; x = 0, \mathrm{for} \; n &gt; 0<br />
 


I'm supposed to prove that fn(x )= xan is uniformly convergent (an = 1/2 + 1/4 + ... + 1/2n).

The problem suggests I show that |fn(x) - f(x)| < 1 - an if x is in [0,1]

I've been using the fact that an = (2n-1)/2n.
 


Have you found the limit function f(x)?
 
  • #10


Dickfore said:
Have you found the limit function f(x)?

f(x) = x
 
  • #11


Assume x = 1 + t. Because 0 \le x \le 1, this implies:

<br /> \left{\begin{array}{l}<br /> 1 + t \ge 0 \\<br /> <br /> 1 + t \le 1<br /> \end{array}\right. \Rightarrow -1 \le t \le 0<br />

Now, you might find it useful to use the following inequality:

<br /> (\forall t &gt; -1) (\forall n \in \mathbb{N}) (1 + t)^{n} &gt; 1 + n t<br />

which may be proven by mathematical induction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K