Help with this problem - Proof with first and second derivatives

  • Thread starter Thread starter emjay66
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around proving the inequality |f'(0)| + |f'(a)| ≤ am, given that |f''(x)| ≤ m for x in the interval [0,a] and that f attains its maximum at an interior point. The Mean Value Theorem for integrals and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus are utilized to derive the relationship between the derivatives. The key insight is recognizing that the maximum at point c implies f'(c) = 0, which is crucial for completing the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Mean Value Theorem for integrals
  • Familiarity with the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
  • Knowledge of first and second derivatives in calculus
  • Concept of continuity of functions on closed intervals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Mean Value Theorem in calculus
  • Explore the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in detail
  • Learn about the implications of maximum and minimum values of functions
  • Investigate proofs involving inequalities in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on derivatives and their applications, as well as educators looking for examples of derivative proofs and inequalities.

emjay66
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Help with this problem -- Proof with first and second derivatives

Homework Statement


I'm stuck on this problem and I'm not sure what I'm missing. The problem states:
Assume that |f''(x)| \leq m for each x in the interval [0,a], and assume that f takes on its largest value at an interior point of this interval. Show that |f'(0)|+|f'(a)| \leq am. You may assume that f'' is continuous on [0,a]

Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution


I first observed that using the Mean Value Theorem for integrals and letting c be a number in the interval [0,a], I can obtain
<br /> \int_0^a|f&#039;&#039;(t)|\,dt = |f&#039;&#039;(c)|.(a-0) \leq m.a<br />
I also observed that, using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, I can also obtain
<br /> \int_0^a|f&#039;&#039;(t)|\,dt = |f&#039;(a)| - |f&#039;(0)|<br />
which would imply
<br /> |f&#039;(a)| - |f&#039;(0)| \leq m.a<br />
I know that
<br /> 0\leq|f&#039;(a)| - |f&#039;(0)| \leq |f&#039;(a) - f&#039;(0)| \leq |f&#039;(a)| + |f&#039;(0)|<br />
but I haven't been able to determine what the next step is. Based on the above information, I can't see how I can deduce the answer from what I have so far, so I'm clearly missing something. Any Hints would be very welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
emjay66 said:

Homework Statement


I'm stuck on this problem and I'm not sure what I'm missing. The problem states:
Assume that |f&#039;&#039;(x)| \leq m for each x in the interval [0,a], and assume that f takes on its largest value at an interior point of this interval. Show that |f&#039;(0)|+|f&#039;(a)| \leq am. You may assume that f&#039;&#039; is continuous on [0,a]

Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution


I first observed that using the Mean Value Theorem for integrals and letting c be a number in the interval [0,a], I can obtain
<br /> \int_0^a|f&#039;&#039;(t)|\,dt = |f&#039;&#039;(c)|.(a-0) \leq m.a<br />
I also observed that, using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, I can also obtain
<br /> \int_0^a|f&#039;&#039;(t)|\,dt = |f&#039;(a)| - |f&#039;(0)|<br />
which would imply
<br /> |f&#039;(a)| - |f&#039;(0)| \leq m.a<br />
I know that
<br /> 0\leq|f&#039;(a)| - |f&#039;(0)| \leq |f&#039;(a) - f&#039;(0)| \leq |f&#039;(a)| + |f&#039;(0)|<br />
but I haven't been able to determine what the next step is. Based on the above information, I can't see how I can deduce the answer from what I have so far, so I'm clearly missing something. Any Hints would be very welcome.

The fundamental theorem of calculus does NOT tell you that ##\int_0^a|f''(t)|\,dt = |f'(a)| - |f'(0)|##. It tells you that##\int_0^c f''(t)\,dt = f'(c) - f'(0)##. There is an interior maximum at some point x=c. You haven't used that yet. Use that.
 
Thanks. The correct interpretation of the FTC was a useful hint, as well as f'(c) = 0 for a c in [0,a].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K