A question about line images(electrostatics)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the equations of equipotential surfaces for two lines of charge, which are described as infinite cylinders with specific parameters. The potential of a configuration involving an infinite line of charge near an infinite conducting cylinder is derived using these equations. A key concern raised is that the determination of x_0, the center of the circle in the cylinder's intersection with the xy plane, seems to depend on other parameters, which appears inconsistent. The potential function is expressed in terms of charge densities and distances in cylindrical coordinates. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between these variables in electrostatics.
ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
In Nayfeh's electricity and magnetism,the equation of equipotential surfaces of two lines of charges are found and they are infinite cyliners with
radius and center(center of the circle which is in the plane,we're solving problem in) given by the following equations:

x_0=\frac{m^2+1}{m^2-1} a
R^2=x_0^2-a^2=\left(\frac{2ma}{m^2-1}\right)^2

with m a constant and 2a the distance between lines of charge.

Then the results above are used to find the potential of a configuration like an infinite line of charge near an infinite conducting cylinder.
x_0(the center of circle which is part of cylinder) and a(which is half the distance of charge line and its image) are found and using them,m
is found which determines the potential function.
My problem is this.When we see the configuration,as soon as we setup the coordinate system and choose the origine,x_0 is determined.
It shouldn't depend on other parameters!

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't have that book on hand. Can you describe what each of these symbols means.
 
At first the potential of two line charges with charge densities \lambda and -\lambda is found to be:

\phi=\frac{\lambda}{2 \pi \varepsilon_0}\ln {\frac{\rho_-}{\rho_+}}

Where \rho_- and \rho_+ are the distace of the observation point to the line with minus and plus charge,respectively,in
cylindrical coordinates.

The equipotential surfaces are found by equating \frac{\rho_-}{\rho_+} to a constant, m.
They are cylinders with radius R.
And x_0 is the center of the circle which is the intersection of the cylinder and the xy plane.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top