MHB A question about powers n^2+n^3=n^4−n^2(n−1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Angel11
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation n^2 + n^3 = n^4 - n^2(n - 1) holds true only for n = 2, as confirmed through algebraic manipulation. Initial exploration with different bases like 3 and 4 led to incorrect results, but revealed a pattern in the calculations. The breakdown of the equation shows that after dividing by n^2, simplifying leads to the conclusion that 2n = n^2, which only satisfies n = 2. This indicates that the relationship is unique to the number 2 within the natural numbers. The discussion highlights the importance of verifying mathematical patterns through substitution and simplification.
Angel11
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
So recently i was plaing around with powers again and i found that (2^2)+(2^3)=(2^4)-(2^2) which when i thought of that at the start i thought it was an error since i didn't use a calculator but after it i confirmed that it is right. So after that i wanted to see if the same combination of powers works withother numbers instead of 2. for example (3^2)+(3^3)=(3^4)-(3^2). Which of course was wrong although it brought me to another conglusion which was "(2^2)+(2^3)=((2^4)-(2^2)*1)),(3^2)+(3^3)=((3^4)-(3^2)*2), (4^2)+(4^3)=((4^4)-(4^2)*3)... So my question is how does this work?.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It looks like you are wondering for what values of $n\in\mathbb{N}$ is the following true:

$$n^2+n^3=n^4-n^2(n-1)$$

Divide through by $n^2\ne0$:

$$1+n=n^2-(n-1)$$

Distribute:

$$1+n=n^2-n+1$$

Add $n-1$ to both sides:

$$2n=n^2\implies n=2$$

So, the only value of $n$ for which that works is $n=2$. :)
 
MarkFL said:
It looks like you are wondering for what values of $n\in\mathbb{N}$ is the following true:

$$n^2+n^3=n^4-n^2(n-1)$$

Divide through by $n^2\ne0$:

$$1+n=n^2-(n-1)$$

Distribute:

$$1+n=n^2-n+1$$

Add $n-1$ to both sides:

$$2n=n^2\implies n=2$$

So, the only value of $n$ for which that works is $n=2$. :)
Thank you for explaning :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top