MHB A question about powers n^2+n^3=n^4−n^2(n−1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Angel11
  • Start date Start date
Angel11
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
So recently i was plaing around with powers again and i found that (2^2)+(2^3)=(2^4)-(2^2) which when i thought of that at the start i thought it was an error since i didn't use a calculator but after it i confirmed that it is right. So after that i wanted to see if the same combination of powers works withother numbers instead of 2. for example (3^2)+(3^3)=(3^4)-(3^2). Which of course was wrong although it brought me to another conglusion which was "(2^2)+(2^3)=((2^4)-(2^2)*1)),(3^2)+(3^3)=((3^4)-(3^2)*2), (4^2)+(4^3)=((4^4)-(4^2)*3)... So my question is how does this work?.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It looks like you are wondering for what values of $n\in\mathbb{N}$ is the following true:

$$n^2+n^3=n^4-n^2(n-1)$$

Divide through by $n^2\ne0$:

$$1+n=n^2-(n-1)$$

Distribute:

$$1+n=n^2-n+1$$

Add $n-1$ to both sides:

$$2n=n^2\implies n=2$$

So, the only value of $n$ for which that works is $n=2$. :)
 
MarkFL said:
It looks like you are wondering for what values of $n\in\mathbb{N}$ is the following true:

$$n^2+n^3=n^4-n^2(n-1)$$

Divide through by $n^2\ne0$:

$$1+n=n^2-(n-1)$$

Distribute:

$$1+n=n^2-n+1$$

Add $n-1$ to both sides:

$$2n=n^2\implies n=2$$

So, the only value of $n$ for which that works is $n=2$. :)
Thank you for explaning :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top