twofish-quant
- 6,821
- 20
Also there are two H-R diagrams. Theorists work with bolometric luminosity versus effective temperature. You run the computer model, that gives you energy output and a radius were pressure goes to zero, you then calculate an effective temperature.
Observers work with color versus absolute magnitude. You measure the brightness of the star with two colored filters and plot on one axis, you take the visual magnitude correct for distance, plot on the other axis.
These two scales are roughly the same, but if you want to do precision work, then you have to apply all sorts of correction terms. In the observers diagram you are measuring color temperature whereas in the theorists diagram, you are measuring effective temperature. People go spend a ton of effort getting all this right, see..
http://iopscience.iop.org/1538-3881/120/2/1072/990160.text.html
The pattern in which everything becomes more complicated when you look at it closely is common thing in astronomy. For example if I ask you want time is it, do you mean TCG, TCG, UT, or TAI?
Observers work with color versus absolute magnitude. You measure the brightness of the star with two colored filters and plot on one axis, you take the visual magnitude correct for distance, plot on the other axis.
These two scales are roughly the same, but if you want to do precision work, then you have to apply all sorts of correction terms. In the observers diagram you are measuring color temperature whereas in the theorists diagram, you are measuring effective temperature. People go spend a ton of effort getting all this right, see..
http://iopscience.iop.org/1538-3881/120/2/1072/990160.text.html
The pattern in which everything becomes more complicated when you look at it closely is common thing in astronomy. For example if I ask you want time is it, do you mean TCG, TCG, UT, or TAI?