A question about the speed of light puzzles me

yeti1112007
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
if there is a light source rotate with the Earth (w), so there must be somewhere in the

universe(r) the speed of the shadow of the light (v=r*w) would exceed the speed of light

because the r could be very large. Is it right?
 

Attachments

  • question of light.jpg
    question of light.jpg
    44.4 KB · Views: 470
Physics news on Phys.org
If I'm understanding you correctly, you are saying that the shadow that is produced from the pole blocking the light source, would travel greater than c.

First of all, the shadow is just the absence of light surrounded by light, or it could just be defined as empty space. Further more, if you defined the shadow as an object, it would have 0 mass.
 
Shadows can certainly move faster than the speed of light. This does not break any laws of physics, because it cannot be used to communicate any information faster than the speed of light.

- Warren
 
Right, any change at the source would still need to travel at light speed before it could be seen by the viewer of the "shadow."

Keep in mind that no physical object in your scenario is actually moving faster than light. The photons are still mvoing from the source to the distant viewers at light speed. The "shadow" is the absence of light, which is itself not a physical thing that's moving any more so than a dot on your computer monitor is physically moving across the screen.
 
ok, I see.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top