A question for helium energy transition

newforce
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
For S=0 parahelium, 1s2p-1s2s transition is allowed, but why there is no transition between 1s3p-1s3s? I think the only difference for the electron configurations is principal quantum number. The selection rules applying for 1s2p-1s2s can also be applied to 1s3p-1s3s. In other words, there is no selection rule to forbid the 1s3p-1s3s transition.
 

Attachments

  • Helium.JPG
    Helium.JPG
    28.4 KB · Views: 1,173
Physics news on Phys.org
newforce said:
For S=0 parahelium, 1s2p-1s2s transition is allowed, but why there is no transition between 1s3p-1s3s? I think the only difference for the electron configurations is principal quantum number. The selection rules applying for 1s2p-1s2s can also be applied to 1s3p-1s3s. In other words, there is no selection rule to forbid the 1s3p-1s3s transition.

I think that it should be allowed. The chart is showing observed lines. What wavelength/frequency would the 1s3p-1s3s transition be? It may be that the chart is showing prominenet lines in a particular wavelength region. The one you are looking for might lie outside of this window.

This website shows the transition on there energy level diagram: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/helium.html
 
Quantum Defect said:
I think that it should be allowed. The chart is showing observed lines. What wavelength/frequency would the 1s3p-1s3s transition be? It may be that the chart is showing prominenet lines in a particular wavelength region. The one you are looking for might lie outside of this window.

This website shows the transition on there energy level diagram: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/helium.html

Thanks for your reply. Your idea currently is only reasonable explanation for the missing transition though I still expect more details. BTW, graph in the link clearly shows no transition between 1s3p-1s3s.
 
newforce said:
Thanks for your reply. Your idea currently is only reasonable explanation for the missing transition though I still expect more details. BTW, graph in the link clearly shows no transition between 1s3p-1s3s.

Whoops. You are correct, I mistook the 3p-2s for the one you were asking about.

Here is a better source: http://www.nist.gov/srd/upload/jpcrd382009565p.pdf
This source lists the transition (#73 in the list for He, on page 618) as being 1,344 cm^-1 -- in the infrared region.
 
Quantum Defect said:
Whoops. You are correct, I mistook the 3p-2s for the one you were asking about.

Here is a better source: http://www.nist.gov/srd/upload/jpcrd382009565p.pdf
This source lists the transition (#73 in the list for He, on page 618) as being 1,344 cm^-1 -- in the infrared region.

Thanks so much for the excellent reference! I will read it carefully.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top