A question involving permutations and probability.

missiledragon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So, (this is not homework), I have been stuck on a question regarding probability for a while now and am clueless of how to continue. The question is:

The letters A, E, I, P, Q, and R are arranged in a circle. Find the probability that at least 2 vowels are next to one another.

My attempt: Alright, since one letter is fixed, that leaves us with 5 letters to arrange. I'm going to fix the consonant in this case, since it is particularly easier for me :P. The remaining spots (5 left) can be arranged 3!*2! (remaining vowels and consonants respectively).

I'm lost here though, so any help on what to do/correct me would help. Thanks! :D
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would consider something like this:

You have 3 vowels {A,E,I} and 3 consonants {P,Q,R}

You want arrangements of the types:

1) V1, C1 , V2 ,C2, V3, C3 , where Vi is a vowel, Ci a consonant, or:

2) C1,V1 ,C2 , V2, C3, V3

To guarantee that there are no consecutive vowels. Every other arrangement will contain consecutive

vowels. Then you have to put the arrangement in a circle and consider the ones that are equal as

permutations, e.g:

A P E Q I R is the same as P E Q I R A , when put into a circle, and so is E Q I R A P , etc.
 
Wow! missledragon waited 13 whole minutes before bumping! That may be a new record.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Back
Top