A question on dispersion of Prism

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tspirit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dispersion Prism
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of light dispersion through a prism and the concept of chromatic aberration. Participants conclude that the refracted rays of different wavelengths do not converge at a single point due to varying refractive indices. The use of Snell's Law and simulations in Mathematica confirms that rays of different colors, such as red, blue, and yellow, diverge rather than intersect. This phenomenon is critical for understanding optical systems and the limitations of simple ray tracing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Snell's Law for refraction
  • Basic knowledge of chromatic aberration
  • Familiarity with optical properties of prisms
  • Experience with Mathematica for simulations
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced optics concepts, including ray tracing techniques
  • Learn about the impact of wavelength on refractive indices in different materials
  • Study the mathematical modeling of light dispersion using Mathematica
  • Investigate methods to minimize chromatic aberration in optical designs
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in the principles of light behavior and optical design will benefit from this discussion.

Tspirit
Messages
50
Reaction score
6
As the Figure shown, a white light beam is dispersed by the prism. The refracted beams will have different directions. My question is, will their reverse extension lines intersect into one point, or not? If it will, where is the point? And the proof? Thanks a lot.
 

Attachments

  • 图片1.png
    图片1.png
    10 KB · Views: 581
Science news on Phys.org
My intuition says that the extension of all rays will not meet at exactly the same point due to the chromatic aberration. Currently I don't have enough time to derive a formal algebraic proof, but I think you can follow the following reasoning.
Draw three rays and assume that all colors have the same refractive indices. Assume that the extension of the rays do meet at one point.
But in reality, the refractive index of materials always depends on the wavelength and since this dependency is arbitrary, you can change, e.g. the index for red ray only, to some other value causing the red ray to miss the intersection point with the other two rays. Therefore, generally there is no single intersection point for all rays.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tspirit
blue_leaf77 said:
My intuition says that the extension of all rays will not meet at exactly the same point due to the chromatic aberration. Currently I don't have enough time to derive a formal algebraic proof, but I think you can follow the following reasoning.
Draw three rays and assume that all colors have the same refractive indices. Assume that the extension of the rays do meet at one point.
But in reality, the refractive index of materials always depends on the wavelength and since this dependency is arbitrary, you can change, e.g. the index for red ray only, to some other value causing the red ray to miss the intersection point with the other two rays. Therefore, generally there is no single intersection point for all rays.
Thank you for your kind reply. In my opinion, all of the output rays comes from the same ray, if it is like the imaging of an object from a plane mirror, where the reverse rays of all of the reflected will meet exactly the same point, the observer seeing the colored rays from the prism may think all of the rays comes from one point or ray. However, I have no proofs either.
 
Tspirit said:
the observer seeing the colored rays from the prism may think all of the rays comes from one point or ray.
If the original ray is actually a ray (or slit), the observer will only see one narrow band of wavelengths at each angle of the eye. The only way for the observer to 'reconstruct' an image of the source will be to move the eye from side to side and to use a sort of binocular approach to estimate a point where all the various coloured rays come from.
I concur with blue_leaf77 and I don't think that there will be a single point through which all the rays appear to have come from / through. If you wanted to do the exercise yourself, it wouldn't be difficult to show what happens. Draw the thing out with a neat prism and a source and, using Snell's Law, calculate the angles of refraction of blue, yellow and red rays (just choose representative wavelengths), coming from the arrival point on the entry face. Do the same thing at the exit face. and you should get three rays (lines) emerging from the exit face. If those lines produced backwards pass through a point then your idea may be correct. Have fun with a ruler and protractor! :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tspirit
sophiecentaur said:
I concur with blue_leaf77 and I don't think that there will be a single point through which all the rays appear to have come from / through.
Thank you for your help. You and blue_leaf77 are right. I have simulated it with mathematica and find the inverse rays (I used two) really do not go through a single point.
 
Tspirit said:
I have simulated it with mathematica
And why not? Pencil and paper are old hat and only used by old gimmers for many problems. Can be handy though!
You could be really smartarse and do it all with trigonometry and algebraic jiggery pokery.
 
Tspirit said:
(I used two)
You have to use at least three rays of different wavelength to prove that they don't intersect at one point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
blue_leaf77 said:
You have to use at least three rays of different wavelength to prove that they don't intersect at one point.
Yes, you are right, I made a mistake. I have added the third rays and found they don't intersect at one point. Thank you for pointing it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 207 ·
7
Replies
207
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K