How Does Time Dilation Affect Light Speed from a Moving Spaceship?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Giulio B.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sr
Giulio B.
A spaceship is moving, then it launches a ray of light behind itself.
if time in the spaceship is slower than in other frames that are moving less fast, shouldn't the ray appear much faster than c?

this thing works with a ray launched in front of the ship, but behind, shouldn't the time go faster to let us see the ray at c speed?
thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Giulio B. said:
A spaceship is moving, then it launches a ray of light behind itself.
if time in the spaceship is slower than in other frames that are moving less fast, shouldn't the ray appear much faster than c?

this thing works with a ray launched in front of the ship, but behind, shouldn't the time go faster to let us see the ray at c speed?
thanks.


No. First of all "The time on the ship" relative to the ship isn't slowed at all. As far as the crew of the ship are concerned, they might as well be at rest. That's why their state is caled the "Rest Frame" of the ship. Ship time is only slowed as experienced by an observer for whom the ship is moving fast.

So the ship, at rest with respect to itself, emits a light beam in any direction, and the crew measures the beam's light speed, and whaddayaknow, they get c.
 
Someone traveling behind the ship, catching up to it with greater speed, would meet the beam of light head on and also measure the light's speed at c.

A third person watching the two ships both whiz by from a nearby planet would also measure the light's speed at c.
 
Last edited:
if time in the spaceship is slower than in other frames that are moving less fast

This isn't quite right. In SR, everything's relative. One frame can not be said to be moving faster or slower than another. From the spaceship's frame, time is moving slower both ahead and behind it. From a planet's frame (as the spaceship goes whizzing by) time is moving slower on the spaceship. Both frames see a time contraction and a length contraction that force c to be the same speed in any reference frame.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top