A question on thermal radiation

AI Thread Summary
Black surfaces are known to absorb and radiate heat effectively due to their high emissivity. However, many heating devices have a silverish finish primarily for cost reasons and to enhance aesthetic appeal. While black surfaces are excellent for radiative cooling, they may not conduct heat well to other materials, which can affect overall efficiency. Additionally, some heating devices utilize polished metal reflectors to direct infrared radiation more effectively. Ultimately, the choice of surface color in heating devices balances efficiency, cost, and design considerations.
cfung
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
It is common knowledge that black colored surface absorbs light and heat the best. Then it seems to me the next logical leap would to think that black colored surfaces would radiate heat most efficiently.

If my assumption is correct, then why do most heating devices, such as oil heater or common home heater, have silverish finish instead of black?

Thank you for your time reading this.
 
Science news on Phys.org
cfung said:
It is common knowledge that black colored surface absorbs light and heat the best. Then it seems to me the next logical leap would to think that black colored surfaces would radiate heat most efficiently.
Very good, your intuition about absorptivity and emissivity (as they are called) is correct.

cfung said:
If my assumption is correct, then why do most heating devices, such as oil heater or common home heater, have silverish finish instead of black?

Am not sure what kind of heater you are referring to. The kind with heating coils that glow orange are usually backed by a polished metal reflector that projects the infrared radiation forward.

A better example is to consider the heat sinks on electronic devices--they are nearly always black for maximum radiative cooling. The only exceptions tend to be the the integrated heat sink/fan units on big computer chips. The color doesn't matter in this case because cooling is achieved via forced air flow.
 
Its not always about being the most efficient. Cost comes into play a lot as well. Back anodizing or powder coating costs money which a manufacturer may omit due to keep costs down.

Also, while black does transfer radiant heat the best, it doesn't always conduct it well. In other words, a black powder coating may transfer heat from the air to itself well, but not from itself to the material its been coated to.
 
cfung said:
It is common knowledge that black colored surface absorbs light and heat the best. Then it seems to me the next logical leap would to think that black colored surfaces would radiate heat most efficiently.

If my assumption is correct, then why do most heating devices, such as oil heater or common home heater, have silverish finish instead of black?

Thank you for your time reading this.

You are correct, absorption = emission, so a black object would be a better emitter than a reflective object- with the caveat that I mean "black" and "reflecting" within the waveband of interest (8-12 microns for room temperature, 3-5 microns for hot objects).

Radiators are not generally painted black purely for decorative reasons. In addition, those 'decorative' enclosures also act to decrease the efficiency of the radiator. AFAIK, heat fins on circuit boards and in non-visible places (i.e. backs of amplifiers) are indeed black.
 
Cool, millions of thanks guys, the answers are reasonably convincing and exactly resolve a thought that's been giving me a headache
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top