A question regarding columns and GNm and MNm

  • Thread starter Thread starter Harrison01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Columns
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion of units related to Young's modulus and yield stress in the context of column buckling. The Young's modulus provided is 200 GPa, which converts to 200,000 MPa, while the yield stress is given as 140 MPa. Participants emphasize the importance of using correct unit nomenclature and formatting, adhering to international standards such as ISO 31-0. The confusion arises from the transition between different unit systems, specifically from GN/m² to MN/m² and MPa.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Young's modulus and yield stress
  • Familiarity with SI unit conversions, particularly between GPa and MPa
  • Knowledge of column buckling principles
  • Awareness of international standards for unit notation (ISO 31-0)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of column buckling and critical load calculations
  • Learn about SI unit conversions, focusing on GPa to MPa
  • Review the ISO 31-0 standard for proper unit notation
  • Explore practical applications of Young's modulus in engineering design
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, students in mechanical or civil engineering, and professionals involved in material science who require a solid understanding of material properties and unit conversions in structural analysis.

Harrison01
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Ok i have a question regarding columns and it goes a bit like this,

What is the minimum length of the column at which buckling is
likely to occur?

They have given me the youngs modulus of 200GNm-2 (200,000,000,000 Nm) and a yield stress of 140MNm-2 (140,000,000Nm).

For working out my equation I'm trying to get the figures in the same unit. So 200GNm-2 to MNm

Do i divide the 200 by 1 million to give me 0.0002Nm and then multiply it by 100,000 to give me 200, but this then can't be right?

where am i going wrong folks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Harrison01: (1) MN*m^-2 is called MPa. Always use the correct, special name for a unit. E.g., 140 MPa, not 140 MN*m^-2. See the international standard for writing units[/color] (ISO 31-0[/color]).

(2) Always leave a space between a numeric value and its following unit symbol. E.g., 140 MPa, not 140MPa.

(3) Two unit symbols multiplied together cannot be written together, and must be separated by an asterisk or a space. E.g., N*m or N m, not Nm.

(4) The international standard says you can write digits of long numbers in groups of three, separated by spaces, not commas. E.g., 140 000 000 Pa, not 140,000,000 Pa.

(5) 1 GPa = 1000 MPa. Therefore, 200 GPa = 200 000 MPa.

(6) Other valid ways to write 200 000 MPa include, e.g., 200*10^3 MPa, or 200e3 MPa. Another way to write, e.g., -0.3 m^-4 is -0.3*10^-12 mm^-4, or -0.3e-12 mm^-4.
 
Last edited:
Cheers NVN, that's starting to make things a lot clearer for me now...

I think what threw me is that in the question i was given, all the figures were GN m and MN m and the example i was given the figures were in MPa and GPa..

Finding getting used to all these SI units and powers of 10 a struggle as its been so long since last using it..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
27K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K