Slenderness ratio, mode of failure

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem related to the slenderness ratio of a column and its modes of failure, specifically focusing on buckling and crushing. Participants explore the calculations required to determine the minimum length for buckling to occur, the expected mode of failure at different lengths, and the corresponding failure loads.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the effective length of a column and proposes that the slenderness ratio indicates the mode of failure, questioning if it suggests crushing.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the minimum length for buckling to occur based on the effective length provided.
  • A participant revisits their calculations, correcting the area used and suggesting that the minimum length for buckling is approximately 5.93 m, with buckling as the failure mode.
  • Concerns are raised about the failure load calculations, particularly for a column length that is halved, with a suggestion to recheck assumptions regarding failure modes.
  • One participant shares their method for calculating the moment of inertia and area, indicating a potential discrepancy in earlier calculations.
  • A later reply expresses confusion about determining whether the column will buckle or crush, highlighting challenges with unit conversions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach to determining the minimum length for buckling and the relationship between slenderness ratio and failure modes. However, there is uncertainty regarding the specific calculations for failure loads and the conditions under which buckling or crushing occurs, indicating that multiple views remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the assumptions made in calculations, particularly concerning the definitions of effective length and slenderness ratio, as well as the dependencies on specific material properties and geometrical parameters.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and practitioners interested in structural engineering, mechanics of materials, and failure analysis may find this discussion relevant.

Jayohtwo
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hi guys (first post here let me know if I can fix anything that I've done wrong),

I'm struggling a little with the second part of this question and seem to be going round in circles
upload_2015-10-26_15-10-26.png

A column has the dimensions shown in the diagram below.
(a) What is the minimum length of the column at which buckling is
likely to occur?
(b) If the column is the length determined in (a),
(i) What will be the mode of failure?
(ii) At what load would you expect failure to occur?
(c) If the column is half the length determined in (a) :
(i) What will be the mode of failure?
(ii) At what load would you expect failure to occur?

Homework Equations


A = 8.796x10-3 m2
I = 2.199x10-5 m4
K = 0.05 (least value of radius of gyration)
Slenderness ratio (using length not effective length unsure if this is correct) = 237.4

The Attempt at a Solution


Part a: I have determined the effective length to be 5.94m as the column is fixed at both ends and Le=L/2

Part b: Here's where my google skills fall short and I'm not sure how to determine what failure mode. I've also calculated the effective slenderness ratio using ESR = √(π2E)/(σ) = 118.74.
As this is less then the slenderness ratio does this mean that the failure mode is crushing?

Part c: Will be straightforward enough to solve when I can figure ou how to do part b

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the effective length is as calculated, what is the minimum length of the column for buckling to occur?
 
Has this exact same problem has been discussed previously on PF ?
 
Nidum said:
Has this exact same problem has been discussed previously on PF ?
Yes it has but the thread had died about 2 years ago and only the first part of the question was discussed. I'll put some more work into this question later today and see if I can come to a conclusion.
 
I've gone back over the question and noticed I've used diameter instead of radius for area so A= 2.199x10-3 m2
this makes Le = 2.96 m and L = 5.93 m and this seems to be the minimum length that buckling will occur.

Part b: Failure mode is buckling (not 100% on this)
ii: Failure Load Fc = σcA=307876.08 N

Part c: if min length for buckling was 5.94 failure mode will be crushing (again not 100% certain)
ii: Failure load for 1/2 length Fc = π2EI/Le2 = 1234601.72 N
 
I am not sure how you arrived at your numbers for I and A etc but aside from the math, your approach for finding the minimum length is correct, above which failure is likely by buckling and below which failure would be by crushing or yielding. But you should check again about the failure load if the column was halved...your answer assumes buckling is the failure load, so recheck that...
 
I got my answer for I and A using :

I = (D4 - d4)π/64
= (0.084 - 0.064)π/64
= 1.37x10-6 m4

A = π(R2 - r2)
= π(0.042 - 0.032)
= 2.199 x10 -3 m2

I'll recheck my notes later today and read up on the failure modes.
 
Hi I am on the same question and its not very clear I don't think. I am finding the units are tricky. How do you work out if it will buckle or crush ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
28K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
Replies
10
Views
3K