A question with the readings of synchronized clocks

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bernhard.rothenstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clocks
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the derivation of Lorentz transformations using synchronized clocks in an inertial reference frame, as proposed by Einstein. The key conclusion is that the factor A, which accounts for length distortion due to relative motion, is derived as A=sqrt(1-V^2/c^2). The participant seeks clarification on whether their derivation, which incorporates linearity, symmetry, isotropy, and reciprocity, is free of flaws and invites contributions to enhance the standardization of this derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's two postulates of special relativity
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations
  • Knowledge of inertial reference frames
  • Basic principles of time dilation and length contraction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Explore Einstein's postulates of special relativity
  • Investigate the implications of time dilation and length contraction
  • Review Levy's recent work in the American Journal of Physics for alternative derivations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of special relativity and the implications of synchronized clocks in different reference frames.

bernhard.rothenstein
Messages
988
Reaction score
1
Consider that from the origin O of the inertial reference frame O start at the origin of time a particle that moves with speed u<c and a photon with speed c both in the positive direction of the OX axis. At each point of that axis we find a clock all the clocks being synchronized following the procedure proposed by Einstein. After a given time t of motion the photon arrives at the location of a clock C(x)[x=ct,y=0). What is the reading of a clock located where the particle arrives when the photon arrives at the location mentioned above?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to observers in frame O, when the photon arrives at point x = ct all frame O clocks, including the one at point x = ut, will read the same time t. Of course, since these points are spatially separated in O, other frames will disagree.
 
clock readings

Doc Al said:
According to observers in frame O, when the photon arrives at point x = ct all frame O clocks, including the one at point x = ut, will read the same time t. Of course, since these points are spatially separated in O, other frames will disagree.
Thanks for helping me to change my question which becomes:"What is the distance traveled by the moving particle?" If it is ut=ux/c then consider the relative positions of the reference frames I and I' detected from I when the synchronized clocks of that frame read t. Let E(x=ct,y=0, t=x/c) and E'(x'=ct',y'=0, t'=x'/c) same events taking place on the overlapped axes OX(O'X'). Taking into account that relative motion distorts length and time intervals then adding only lengths measured in I we obtain
x-Vt=Ax' (1)
where A is a factor that accounts for the distorsion of lenghts. It could depend on the relative speed V but not on the space-time coordinates involved in the transformation process.
Considering the relative positions of I and I' detected from I' when the clocks of that frame read t' we obtain adding only lengths measured in I'
Ax=x'+Vt' (2)
Presenting (1) and (2) as
ct-Vt=Act' (3)
ct'+Vt'=Act (4)
the result is
A=sqrt(1-VV/cc) (5)
and so the Lorentz transformations for the space time coordinates are derived. Solving them for t and t' we obtain the Lorentz transformations for the time coordinates,
The problem is what was used above bedides Einstein's two postulates:
-Considering that the factor A is the same in I and I' as well we have involved linearity and simmetry.
-Considering that if I' moves with speed V relative to I and that I moves relative to I' with speed -V we took into account isotropy and reciprocity.
Did I use more?
A simillar derivation was presented recently by Levy (Am.J.Phys) consdiering that A is known from thought experiments.
Is the derivation free of flows?
Far from me to consider that was I have presented above is my contribution. I simply consider that it could be a standard, time saving and tranmsparent derivation of the LT. Please constribute to it in order to make it better!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
7K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K