A rational design for a personnel airlock

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noisy Rhysling
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Rational
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the inefficiencies of airlocks depicted in "The Martian," particularly their size and air wastage during use. A proposed solution is the "Suitport," a clamshell airlock design that minimizes space between the suit and the lock, allowing for more efficient air reclamation. The idea includes having multiple Suitports for quick egress, though concerns are raised about the increased risk of catastrophic failures due to multiple openings to the outside. The conversation critiques the large airlocks on the Hermes and Hab, suggesting that while they are suitable for freight, they are not ideal for individual use. The integration of smaller clamshell locks into existing airlocks could reduce air loss and structural stress, especially during urgent repairs, highlighting the need for more efficient airlock designs in space missions.
Noisy Rhysling
Messages
999
Reaction score
345
In The Martian we see airlocks that an SUV would fit into. Wastes air every time it's opened, even if pumped down.

I suggest we make an airlock that clamshells down on a space suit and leaves the minimum amount of room between suit and lock for air to be reclaimed from. You could have banks of these is you needed to get a lot of people out quickly. And you could have all kinds of drama around this system, priorities, etc., of use, especially if you just had one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This concept is called Suitport.

You can avoid wasting air by pumping the air out, but that needs large pumps.

Worse than the huge airlocks is the "repair" that occurs later in the movie...
 
  • Like
Likes ProfuselyQuarky
In my humble opinion, banks of these is not a viable solution.

Essentially, this would be a lot of openings to the outside, imho just more chances for catastrophic failures ala decompression because of xyz etc etc
 
Rocco the Stiff said:
In my humble opinion, banks of these is not a viable solution.

Essentially, this would be a lot of openings to the outside, imho just more chances for catastrophic failures ala decompression because of xyz etc etc
So put the armor behind the airlocks. Troop marches into a bay, doors close, the troops cycle through the airlocks. You could have the armor be the deck. Lower it, the personnel move onto it, it returns to position and the troops cycle out through the clamshell locks.

I agree that no solution is perfect, but airlocks like we see on Hermes are good for freight, not egress by individuals. The airlocks on the Hab are hugely wasteful in space, but the clamshell individual locks could be built into the sides of those airlocks and there would be less air to be pumped out before a crewman needed to get out to work on urgent repairs, etc. Cycling large volumes of air in and out would stress the structure, as Mr. Watney demonstrated.
 
I'm currently writing a novel in which my main character was a victim of experimentation (cliche, I know) but has no memory of it. In the experimentation, technology was implanted in the character's body, allowing an AI algorithm to run off of the character and fuse it's psychological aspects with an actual human's. I'm not super knowledgeable in science such as this, and I'm sure doing this would be incredibly hard, if not impossible, to do. So for the sake of keeping the peace, let's just...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
14K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
35
Views
7K
Back
Top